The article provides an overview of carrying out the principles of the
Bologna reform in the education of subject teachers in the newly founded
states in the territory of the former Yugoslavia. Drawing upon official
documents, particularly laws and by-laws, study programmes and constituent
documents of individual universities, the comparative analysis of the reform
processes between 2004 and 2013 is made within a relatively homogeneous area
in teacher education that existed before the break-up of the former joint
state. Positive effects and weak points of the reform activities are observed
and detected. The analysis has shown that by implementing the Bologna process
the differences in the training of subject teachers among the states and
universities, and even among individual universities, increased significantly
compared to the previous state of education. This is evident not only in the
simultaneous implementation of different models (i.e., the duration of
studies (3+2, 4+1, 5+0), but also in concurrent application of simultaneous
and successive forms of acquiring teacher competences, different academic
titles, and particularly in the greatest issue - different levels of
education at which teachers acquire teaching competences for the same teacher
profile.
The subject of this article is the ideological basis on which the study of
the history of pedagogy in Serbia in the 19th century was based. The aim of
the paper was to analyze the scientific and socio-ideological starting
points in the conception of the history of pedagogy in Serbia. As a teaching
discipline, the history of pedagogy in the research period was placed within
the framework of professional education of primary school teachers and
pedagogues. Therefore, the goals and tasks of the history of pedagogy were
adjusted not only to the achievements of this scientific discipline in
Europe at the time, but also to the projected goal of the overall education
in Serbia. Textbooks on the history of pedagogy published in this period
(until 1902) represent the basic source for the anal?ysis of the ideological
foundations on which teaching in the field of the history of education was
based. This analysis shows that the history of pedagogy was understood as a
suitable means of harmonizing the spread of Christian principles with a
?rational educational approach?, so that over time there was an increasingly
professional reflection on the possibilities of using educational theories
in pedagogical practice. At the same time, there was a growing awareness of
the influence of general cultural history on the development of pedagogical
theories, as well as the importance of the national pedagogical heritage.
У овом рау се комараивно-исоријским меоом реисиује развој еаоије као акаемске исцилине у Србији. Циљ је био не само а се орее кључне еае и еерминане о развоја, већ и њеов конекс, е а се на ај начин онуи основа за размарање савремених и буућих ерсекива еаошке науке у нас. Обраа еаа развоја еаоије на универзиеу, ре свеа на Филозофском факулеу у Беорау, и о: консиуисања акаемске исцилине, научноисраживачке оријенација између ва свеска раа, социјалисичко ериоа и саашње сања, невосмислена је оказалa а је евроски конекс бино обележио еаошку науку у нас. Он је омоућио како развој нових еаошких рофесија (а име и нових акаемских субисцилина), ако и афирмисање улое еаоа исраживача. Параоксално, у времену олиичко инерисања у евроску зајеницу ржава, ураво су евроски корени наше националне еаошке школе,најмање рисуни у салном роцесу научно и сручно самореисиивања. Прилика а се ово ауенично евроско искусво наше еаоије реафирмише јесе 125-оишњица Каере за еаоију на Филозофском факулеу у Беорау. еаошка каера у Србији, евроски конекс развоја еаошке науке у Србији.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.