Background: The health benefits of breastfeeding are well-established but for mothers with severe mental illness (SMI), the decision to breastfeed can be complex. Very few prior studies have investigated the infant feeding choices of women with SMI, or the factors associated with this. Our aims were to examine antenatal infant feeding intentions and infant feeding outcomes in a cohort of women admitted for acute psychiatric care in the first postpartum year. We also aimed to examine whether demographic and clinical characteristics associated with breastfeeding were similar to those found in previous studies in the general population, including age, employment, education, BMI, mode of delivery, smoking status, and social support.Methods: This study was a mixed-methods secondary analysis of a national cohort study, ESMI-MBU (Examining the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of perinatal mental health services). Participants had been admitted to acute care with SMI in the first postpartum year. Infant feeding outcomes were retrospectively self-reported by women during a 1-month post-discharge interview. Free-text responses to questions relating to infant feeding and experience of psychiatric services were also explored using thematic analysis.Results: 144 (66.1%) of 218 women reported breastfeeding (mix feeding and exclusive breastfeeding). Eighty five percentage of the cohort had intended to breastfeed and of these, 76.5% did so. Factors associated with breastfeeding included infant feeding intentions, employment and non-Caucasian ethnicity. Although very few women were taking psychotropic medication contraindicated for breastfeeding, over a quarter (n = 57, 26.15%) reported being advised against breastfeeding because of their medication. Women were given this advice by psychiatry practitioners (40% n = 22), maternity practitioners (32.73% n = 18) and postnatal primary care (27.27% n = 15). Most women stopped breastfeeding earlier than they had planned to as a result (81.1% n = 43). Twenty five women provided free text responses, most felt unsupported with infant feeding due to inconsistent information about medication when breastfeeding and that breastfeeding intentions were de-prioritized for mental health care.Conclusion: Women with SMI intend to breastfeed and for the majority, this intention is fulfilled. Contradictory and insufficient advice relating to breastfeeding and psychotropic medication indicates that further training is required for professionals caring for women at risk of perinatal SMI about how to manage infant feeding in this population. Further research is required to develop a more in-depth understanding of the unique infant feeding support needs of women with perinatal SMI.
Background: Mental health disorders are estimated to affect between 10% and 20% of women who access maternity services and can be defined as a public health issue due to the potential consequences for women, children and families. Detecting problems early in pregnancy can significantly improve outcomes for women and their families. However, mental health problems are not being consistently identified in routine midwifery practice and little is known from current literature about midwives' practice in relation to current national guidelines or the impact models of care have on assessing maternal mental health.Objective: To identify midwives' views about barriers and facilitators to screening for mental health in pregnancy using current UK guidelines.Design: Nine community midwives from a single district general hospital in the south of England were recruited to take part in focus groups. Thematic analysis was used to extract key themes from the data. Findings:Three key themes were identified from the focus groups and included system factors, social factors and trust. Barriers and facilitators to screening maternal mental health were associated with the initial 'booking' appointment' and differences in models of care.Barriers to screening were defined as high workload, poor continuity, and a lack of trust between women and midwives. Conclusions:This study highlights key barriers and facilitators associated with mental health screening during pregnancy, including issues of trust and uncertainty about women's willingness to disclose mental health conditions. Further research is required to evaluate the relationship between women and midwives in contemporary practice and the influence this may have on maternal mental health.
Objectives Improvements in the management of complex congenital heart disease, including those with single ventricle physiology, have resulted in increased survival. As this population ages, the recognition of cognitive impairment is increasingly important. At present, little is known about the potential mechanisms of cognitive dysfunction. In this cross‐sectional study, we aimed to characterize the nature of abnormalities in cerebral blood flow and the relationship to cognitive deficits in adults with single ventricular physiology. Patients Ten adults with single ventricular physiology (age 18‐40 years) and 12 age‐ and gender‐matched controls underwent transcranial Doppler ultrasound and accompanying cognitive assessment. Outcome Measures Patients underwent neuropsychological testing that assessed differing cognitive domains, with subjective cognitive decline determined from a 24‐question survey. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound was used to assess baseline cerebral blood flow as well as change in cerebral blood flow velocities from baseline and during cognitive testing. Age, ethnicity, individual, and parental education levels were considered in the multivariate analyses. Results On assessment of cognitive function, the patient group performed more poorly across each of the measured domains. The control group had a significantly greater increase in cerebral blood flow in response to cognitive stimuli compared to the patient cohort; these differences in response to cognitive stimuli were seen to a similar extent across each of the measured cognitive domains. Conclusion Adults with Fontan physiology are underperforming in assessments of executive function with associated abnormalities in cerebral perfusion potentially contributing to cognitive deficits.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.