BackgroundBRCA1/2 pathogenic (P) and likely pathogenic (LP) germline variants are frequent among patients with ovarian carcinoma. However, these variants have not been extensively characterized in patients with ovarian cancer in Brazil.MethodsIn this retrospective study we evaluated clinical characteristics and BRCA1/2 genetic test results from patients with ovarian carcinoma who underwent genetic counseling at A.C.Camargo Cancer Center (Brazil) between 2015 and 2017 and had performed germline genetic testing of BRCA1/2 genes.ResultsAmong 158 patients, 33 P and LP variants and were found (20.8%), 27 in BRCA1 and six in BRCA2, and six variants of unknown clinical significance (VUS). Thirteen percent of the patients did not have Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) results. Three P variants in BRCA1 were found in more than one patient: c.5266dupC (p.Gln1756Profs*74), c.3331_3334delCAAG (p.Gln1111Asnfs5*), and c.211A > G (p.Arg71Gly). One LP variant in BRCA1 had not been previously described, c.4153_4154delCT (p.Leu1385Ilefs*5). Patients with previous diagnosis of breast cancer were carriers of P or LP variant in 8 of 12 cases (66.7%), and patients with a family history of ovarian or breast cancer in first- or second-degree relatives were carriers of P or LP variant in 26.7% of cases compared to 16.9% for patients without family history (p = 0.166).ConclusionPrevalence of BRCA1/2 germline P and LP variants is slightly higher than previously described by the largest occidental studies, with a high prevalence of variant c.5266dupC (p.Gln1756Profs*74) in BRCA1 observed. Moreover, we identified a new LP variant.

No abstract

BackgroundBrain metastasis (BM) is a rare event in ovarian cancer patients. The current prognostic scores that have been used for other tumors do not account for specific characteristics of ovarian cancer, such as platinum sensitivity.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study examined patients with ovarian carcinoma and BM who were treated at a single institution from January 2007 to December 2017. Clinical data on the diagnosis of BM and follow-up were collected. Cox regression was used to evaluate prognostic factors for overall survival (OS).ResultsOf 560 patients, 26 presented with BM. Eight patients were treated with surgery, 15 with whole-brain radiotherapy (RT), and 5 with stereotactic RT, and 4 patients received systemic treatment at the diagnosis of BM. The median OS was 10.8 months. The following factors were associated with OS: platinum-sensitive recurrence (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.12–0.99; p = 0.049), higher number of previous treatment lines (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.12–2.19; p = 0.008), ECOG performance status (HR 2.52, 95% CI 1.24–5.09; p = 0.010), and longer interval from initial diagnosis to BM (p = 0.025). Notably, the number of brain metastasis, the largest tumor size, and progression outside of the CNS were not related to survival. Platinum sensitivity was not associated with any of the classic prognostic factors in brain metastasis patients such as number or size of brain metastasis or disease progression outside the CNS strengthening the hypothesis of the importance of platinum sensitivity to the prognosis of ovarian cancer patients with BM.ConclusionsThe factors related to the biological behavior of the ovarian cancer such as platinum sensitivity at the time of BM diagnosis, fewer number of previous treatment lines and interval from initial diagnosis were associated with survival in ovarian cancer patients with BM, while factors that are usually related to survival in BM in other cancers were not associated with survival in this cohort of ovarian cancer patients. The small number of patients did not allow us to exclude the prognostic role of these former factors that were not associated with survival in the present cohort.

e16540 Background: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) phenotype involves androgen-receptor signalling mechanisms that support the use of enzalutamide (EZ) and abiraterone (Abi). These therapies improve overall survival (OS) and quality-of-life, with a favourable safety profile. There is no validated data defining the best drug or sequence to be used. Methods: A retrospective cohort of mCRPC patients (pts) was analysed at AC Camargo Cancer Center. The primary objective was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and OS in patients treated with EZ or Abi as first line (docetaxel naïve pts). Kaplan-Meier, Log-Rank Test and Cox Regression were used for survival analysis. To address unbalanced characteristics between the two treatment groups treatment efficacy was compared in a propensity score matched cohort. Results: From May, 2002 to September, 2017, 120 pts were treated with Abi (84%) or EZ (36%). Median follow-up was 21.2 months. Median age at diagnosis was 66 (48-84), the majority were Gleason score 7 (34%) and median baseline PSA was 14. Median PFS was 17.4 months in EZ and 10.6 months in Abi group (HR = 0.65; 95%CI: 0.39-1.10; p = 0.11). Median OS was not reached and 31.6 months for EZ and Abi, respectively (HR = 0.60; 95%CI: 0.27-1.36; p = 0.22). EZ was associated with a better PSA response in the first 4 months of treatment (p < 0.001). Independent prognostic factors for worse OS and PFS were ECOG ≥ 1, treatment toxicity ≥ G1 and lower PSA doubling time before treatment and for better OS and PFS were PSA response in the first 4 months and alkaline phosphatase and lactate dehydrogenase response at any time. In the propensity score matched cohort including 72 patients PFS was better in EZ group (HR = 0.36; 95%CI: 0.20-0.64; p < 0.001) but there was no difference in OS (HR = 0.66; 95%CI: 0.27-1.63; p = 0.37). Conclusions: EZ was associated with prolonged PFS and better PSA response, with no OS improvement when compared with Abi for mCRPC before docetaxel, in a propensity score matched analysis.

527 Background: Sidedness alongside with RAS status in colorectal adenocarcinoma has been proved to correlate with survival and response to systemic therapy. There are few data reporting how these clinical characteristics can predict the dissemination of metastasis. We hypothesize that lung metastasis were more common among those with RAS mutations and left colon primary cancers. Methods: In this study, 609 patients with stage I to IV colorectal adenocarcinoma were enrolled retrospectively. Patients were divided by sidedness, right and left and were also classified according to KRAS and NRAS status. The frequencies of lung metastasis were analyzed among the different groups. Results: Of the 609 patients analyzed, 129 (21.1%) had recurrent disease and 206 (33.8%) had synchronous metastasis. RAS status was available in 311 (92.8%) of the metastatic patients and 138(44.4%) were wild type. We found that 60 (34.7%) of the patients with RAS mutated tumors presented with metachronic or synchronous lung metastasis compared with 31 (22.5%) of the wild-type population (p = 0.019). Focusing only on sidedness, excluding rectal cancer since its already described increased incidence of lung metastasis, 47 (29.7%) of the patients with left sided colon cancer had lung metastasis compared with 8 (11.1%) of the right sided primary population (p = 0,002). It was observed similar frequencies of RAS mutations among patients with left (54.1%) and right (57.6%) sided tumor. Conclusions: RAS mutated colorectal adenocarcinoma is associated with an increased incidence of lung metastasis as well as left sided tumors where this finding seems to be independent of RAS status.