INTRODUCTION: The “six-and-twelve” prognostic score was proposed recently to predict survival rate in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). However, it has not been validated externally. We validated this score and previous prognostic scores in Thai HCC patients treated with TACE. METHODS: We identified all HCC patients who underwent TACE between January 2007 and December 2018 at our hospital. The inclusion criteria were treatment-naive, unresectable HCC BCLC-A and BCLC-B; if cirrhosis was present, Child-Pugh score ≤7; and baseline performance status 0–1. RESULTS: Of 716 HCC patients undergoing TACE, 281 (mean age, 61.1 years; 73.0% men, 92.2% with cirrhosis) were eligible. Approximately half of the patients had hepatitis B virus. Median overall survival was 20.3 (95% confidence interval, 16.4–26.3) months. By stratifying with the “six-and-twelve” score (≤6, >6–12, >12), median (95% confidence interval) overall survival was 35.1 (26.4–53.0), 16.0 (11.6–22.6), and 7.6 (5.4–14.9) months, respectively. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) predicting death at 1, 2, and 3 years for the “six-and-twelve” score were 0.714, 0.700, and 0.688, respectively. Compared with the other currently available scores, the AUROC predicting death at 1 year for the “six-and-twelve” score was the most predictive and better than other models except the up-to-seven model. DISCUSSION: Our study confirms the value of the “six-and-twelve” score to predict survival rate of unresectable HCC treated with TACE. However, in our validation cohort, AUROC of the “six-and-twelve” score was slightly lower than that of the original Chinese cohort (0.73).

Background Data on external validation of models developed to distinguish Crohn’s disease (CD) from intestinal tuberculosis (ITB) are limited. This study aimed to validate and compare models using clinical, endoscopic, and/or pathology findings to differentiate CD from ITB. Methods Data from newly diagnosed ITB and CD patients were retrospectively collected from 5 centers located in Thailand or Hong Kong. The data was applied to Lee, et al., Makharia, et al., Jung, et al., and Limsrivilai, et al. model. Results Five hundred and thirty patients (383 CD, 147 ITB) with clinical and endoscopic data were included. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of Limsrivilai’s clinical-endoscopy (CE) model was 0.853, which was comparable to the value of 0.862 in Jung’s model (p = 0.52). Both models performed significantly better than Lee’s endoscopy model (AUROC: 0.713, p<0.01). Pathology was available for review in 199 patients (116 CD, 83 ITB). When 3 modalities were combined, Limsrivilai’s clinical-endoscopy-pathology (CEP) model performed significantly better (AUROC: 0.887) than Limsrivilai’s CE model (AUROC: 0.824, p = 0.01), Jung’s model (AUROC: 0.798, p = 0.005) and Makharia’s model (AUROC: 0.637, p<0.01). In 83 ITB patients, the rate of misdiagnosis with CD when used the proposed cutoff values in each original study was 9.6% for Limsrivilai’s CEP, 15.7% for Jung’s, and 66.3% for Makharia’s model. Conclusions Scoring systems with more parameters and diagnostic modalities performed better; however, application to clinical practice is still limited owing to high rate of misdiagnosis of ITB as CD. Models integrating more modalities such as imaging and serological tests are needed.

No abstract

No abstract