Objective: This study aims to describe the discrepancies found through medication reconciliation performed by a clinical pharmacist in pediatric patients admitted to an oncology public hospital. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out in a North Brazilian oncology public hospital. Patients aged 0 – 19 years old with any cancer diagnosis and/or stage were interviewed by a clinical pharmacist within 24 hours of hospital admission about their current medication use in order to develop an updated list to be compared with the medical prescription. Medication discrepancies were classified according the medication discrepancy taxonomy (MedTax). Results: One hundred and sixty-seven patients were screened for eligibility criteria. Of those, 160 patients were included in this study, with a mean age of 7.2±4.2 years old; 58.2% were boys, taking a mean of 3.0±1.3 drugs, and the most frequent primary diagnosis presented were leukemias (46.9%) and malignant bone tumors (12.5%). One hundred and twenty discrepancies were identified, of which 92.0% were unintentional discrepancies. Among them, 72.7% classified as omission, followed by frequency and/or number of units of dosage form and/or total daily dose (16.2%), duration or length of therapy (7.2%), and drug duplication (3.9%). Ondansetron (37.3%) was the drug more involved in these discrepancies. Conclusion: This study presented high unintentional discrepancies between the updated medication list and the medical prescription in pediatric patients with cancer, most of which classified such as inclusion. Our findings showed the importance of the clinical pharmacist to minimize medication errors in these patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.