Asynchrony events are frequent during noninvasive ventilation with pressure support in infants and in children despite adjusting the cycling-off criterion. Compared with pressure support, neurally adjusted ventilator assist allows improving patient-ventilator synchrony by reducing trigger delay and the number of asynchrony events. Further studies should determine the clinical impact of these findings.

Background: Early mobilization of adults receiving intensive care improves health outcomes, yet little is known about mobilization practices in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs). We aimed to determine the prevalence of and factors associated with physical rehabilitation in PICUs across Europe. Methods: A 2-day, cross-sectional, multicentre point prevalence study was conducted in May and November 2018. The primary outcome was the prevalence of physical therapy (PT)-or occupational therapy (OT)-provided mobility. Clinical data and data on patient mobility, potential mobility safety events, and mobilization barriers were prospectively collected in patients admitted for ≥72 h. Results: Data of 456 children admitted to one of 38 participating PICUs from 15 European countries were collected (456 patient days); 70% were under 3 years of age. The point prevalence of PT-and/or OT-provided mobility activities was 39% (179/456) (95% CI 34.7-43.9%) during the patient days, with significant differences between European regions. Nurses were involved in 72% (924/1283) of the mobility events; in the remaining 28%, PT/OT, physicians, family members, or other professionals were involved. Of the factors studied, family presence was most strongly positively associated with out-of-bed mobilization (aOR 7.83, 95% CI 3.09-19.79). Invasive mechanical ventilation with an endotracheal tube was negatively associated with out-of-bed mobility (aOR 0.28, 95% CI 0.12-0.68). Patients were completely immobile on 25% (115/456) of patient days. Barriers to mobilization were reported on 38% of patient days. The most common reported patient-related barriers were cardiovascular instability (n = 47, 10%), oversedation (n = 39, 9%), and medical contraindication (n = 37, 8%). Potential safety events occurred in 6% of all documented mobilization events. Conclusion: Therapists are infrequently consulted for mobilization of critically ill children in European PICUs. This study highlights the need for a systematic and interdisciplinary mobilization approach for critically ill children.

Asynchrony events are frequent during pressure support in children despite adjusting the cycling off criteria. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist allowed for an almost ten-fold reduction in asynchrony events. Further studies should determine the clinical impact of these findings.

PICU hospitalization is particularly stressful for families. When it is prolonged and the prognostic is uncertain, it can significantly and negatively affect the whole family. To date, little is known on how families with a chronic critically ill (CCI) child are affected. This national study explored the specific PICU-related sources of stress, family functioning and needs of families of CCI patients during a PICU hospitalization. This descriptive qualitative study was conducted in the eight pediatric intensive care units in Switzerland. Thirty-one families with a child meeting the CCI criteria participated in semi-structured interviews. Interviews, including mothers only (n = 12), fathers only (n = 8), or mother and father dyads (n = 11), were conducted in German, French, or English by two trained researchers/clinical nurses specialists. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using deductive and inductive content analyses. Five overarching themes emerged: (1) high emotional intensity, (2) PICU-related sources of stress, (3) evolving family needs, (4) multi-faceted family functioning, and (5) implemented coping strategies. Our study highlighted the importance of caring for families with CCI children. Parents reported high negative emotional responses that affect their family functioning. Families experience was highly dependent on how HCPs were able to meet the parental needs, provide emotional support, reinforce parental empowerment, and allow high quality of care coordination.

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the incidence and causes of infusion alarms in a NICU/PICU setting. METHODS We conducted a 90-day prospective analysis of event logs downloaded daily from infusion pumps (syringe and volumetric pumps). The details about conditions surrounding alarm events were described daily by bedside nurses on a standardized form. The occlusion pressure alarm was set at 300 mm Hg on each device. RESULTS Forty-one pediatric patients including 12 neonates, mean weight 11.0 ± 11.3 kg (minimum–maximum, 0.48–50), were included for a total infusion time of 2164 hours. Eight hundred forty-three infusion alarms were documented (220 [26.1%] occlusion; 273 [32.4%] infusion completed; 324 [38.4%] door open/syringe disengagement; 26 [3.1%] air-in-line) resulting in an incidence of 4.7 infusion (1.2 occlusion) alarms per patient per day. Detailed conditions surrounding occlusion alarm events were documented in only 22.7% (50/220) of the cases. Of these, 36% (18/50) were related to closed or clamped lines, 4% (2/50) to syringe change, 16% (8/50) to drug injection, and 8% (4/50) to patient-related factors. The remaining 36% (18/50) occurred without any apparent external cause during ongoing infusion, among these drug incompatibilities were a potential cause for 12 events. CONCLUSION Alarms from infusion pumps were frequent in the NICU/PICU setting, a quarter of them resulting from line occlusion. Other than well-known triggers (mechanical and patient factors), drug incompatibilities were identified as a potential cause for occlusion alarms in this pilot study.