We sought whether microdamage could rise in postmenopausal osteoporotic women on longterm bisphosphonates, as suggested by recent animal studies. We found few microcracks in iliac bone biopsies, despite a marked reduction in bone turnover.Introduction: Animal studies suggest that bisphosphonates (BPs) could increase microdamage frequency in a dose-dependent manner, caused by excessively suppressed bone turnover. However, there is limited data in humans receiving BP therapeutic doses for >3 yr. Materials and Methods: We measured microcrack frequency and histomorphometry parameters on transiliac bone biopsies in 50 postmenopausal osteoporotic women (mean age ס 68 yr) who had received BP therapy (3 on intravenous pamidronate, 37 on oral alendronate, and 10 on oral risedronate) for at least 3 yr (mean treatment duration ס 6.5 yr). We compared these results with transiliac bone biopsies obtained from 12 cadavers. We used bulk staining with green calcein as a fluorochrome. The microcracks were quantified in three 100-m-thick sections using optic microscopy and were confirmed by laser confocal microscopy. Microcrack frequency (number of microcracks/mm 2 of bone tissue) was compared between treated women and controls using nonparametric tests. We also explored predictors of microcrack frequency, including age, duration of BP therapy, and activation frequency. Results: Among treated women, cancellous bone microcrack frequency was low (mean, 0.13 microcracks/ mm
Sclerostin, a protein produced by osteocytes, inhibits bone formation. Administration of sclerostin antibody results in increased bone formation in multiple animal models. Romosozumab, a humanized sclerostin antibody, has a dual effect on bone, transiently increasing serum biochemical markers of bone formation and decreasing serum markers of bone resorption, leading to increased BMD and reduction in fracture risk in humans. We aimed to evaluate the effects of romosozumab on bone tissue. In a subset of 107 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in the multicenter, international, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled Fracture Study in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis (FRAME), transiliac bone biopsies were performed either after 2 (n = 34) or 12 (n = 73) months of treatment with 210 mg once monthly of romosozumab or placebo to evaluate histomorphometry and microcomputed tomography‐based microarchitectural endpoints. After 2 months, compared with either baseline values assessed after a quadruple fluorochrome labeling or placebo, significant increases (P < 0.05 to P < 0.001) in dynamic parameters of formation (median MS/BS: romosozumab 1.51% and 5.64%; placebo 1.60% and 2.31% at baseline and month 2, respectively) were associated with a significant decrease compared with placebo in parameters of resorption in cancellous (median ES/BS: placebo 3.4%, romosozumab 1.8%; P = 0.022) and endocortical (median ES/BS: placebo 6.3%, romosozumab 1.6%; P = 0.003) bone. At 12 months, cancellous bone formation was significantly lower (P < 0.05 to P < 0.001) in romosozumab versus placebo and the lower values for resorption endpoints seen at month 2 persisted (P < 0.001), signaling a decrease in bone turnover (P = 0.006). No significant change was observed in periosteal and endocortical bone. This resulted in an increase in bone mass and trabecular thickness with improved trabecular connectivity, without significant modification of cortical porosity at month 12. In conclusion, romosozumab produced an early and transient increase in bone formation, but a persistent decrease in bone resorption. Antiresorptive action eventually resulted in decreased bone turnover. This effect resulted in significant increases in bone mass and improved microarchitecture.© 2019 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.