BACKGROUND: Previous research has identified an association between fine particulate matter (PM 2:5) air pollution and lung cancer. Most of the evidence for this association, however, is based on research using lung cancer mortality, not incidence. Research that examines potential associations between PM 2:5 and incidence of non-lung cancers is limited. OBJECTIVES: The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between the incidence of cancer and exposure to PM 2:5 using >8:5 million cases of cancer incidences from U.S. registries. Secondary objectives include evaluating the sensitivity of the associations to model selection, spatial control, and latency period as well as estimating the exposure-response relationship for several cancer types. METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program data were used to calculate incidence rates for various cancer types in 607 U.S. counties. County-level PM 2:5 concentrations were estimated using integrated empirical geographic regression models. Flexible seminonparametric regression models were used to estimate associations between PM 2:5 and cancer incidence for selected cancers while controlling for important county-level covariates. Primary time-independent models using average incidence rates from 1992-2016 and average PM 2:5 from 1988-2015 were estimated. In addition, time-varying models using annual incidence rates from 2002-2011 and lagged moving averages of annual estimates for PM 2:5 were also estimated. RESULTS: The incidences of all cancer and lung cancer were consistently associated with PM 2:5. The incident rate ratios (IRRs), per 10-lg=m 3 increase in
BackgroundCohort studies have documented associations between fine particulate matter air pollution (PM2.5) and mortality risk. However, there remains uncertainty regarding the contribution of co-pollutants and the stability of pollution-mortality associations in models that include multiple air pollutants. Furthermore, it is unclear whether the PM2.5-mortality relationship varies spatially, when exposures are decomposed according to scale of spatial variability, or temporally, when effect estimates are allowed to change between years.MethodsA cohort of 635,539 individuals was compiled using public National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data from 1987 to 2014 and linked with mortality follow-up through 2015. Modelled air pollution exposure estimates for PM2.5, other criteria air pollutants, and spatial decompositions (< 1 km, 1–10 km, 10–100 km, > 100 km) of PM2.5 were assigned at the census-tract level. The NHIS samples were also divided into yearly cohorts for temporally-decomposed analyses. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in regression models that included up to six criteria pollutants; four spatial decompositions of PM2.5; and two- and five-year lagged mean PM2.5 exposures in the temporally-decomposed cohorts. Meta-analytic fixed-effect estimates were calculated using results from temporally-decomposed analyses and compared with time-independent results using 17- and 28-year exposure windows.ResultsIn multiple-pollutant analyses, PM2.5 demonstrated the most robust pollutant-mortality association. Coarse fraction particulate matter (PM2.5–10) and sulfur dioxide (SO2) were also associated with excess mortality risk. The PM2.5-mortality association was observed across all four spatial scales of PM2.5, with higher but less precisely estimated HRs observed for local (< 1 km) and neighborhood (1–10 km) variations. In temporally-decomposed analyses, the PM2.5-mortality HRs were stable across yearly cohorts. The meta-analytic HR using two-year lagged PM2.5 equaled 1.10 (95% CI 1.07, 1.13) per 10 μg/m3. Comparable results were observed in time-independent analyses using a 17-year (HR 1.13, CI 1.09, 1.16) or 28-year (HR 1.09, CI 1.07, 1.12) exposure window.ConclusionsLong-term exposures to PM2.5, PM2.5–10, and SO2 were associated with increased risk of all-cause and cardiopulmonary mortality. Each spatial decomposition of PM2.5 was associated with mortality risk, and PM2.5-mortality associations were consistent over time.
Background Exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) air pollution has been linked to increased risk of mortality, especially cardiopulmonary and lung cancer mortality. It is unknown if cancer patients and survivors are especially vulnerable to PM2.5 air pollution exposure. This study evaluates PM2.5 exposure and risk for cancer and cardiopulmonary mortality in cohorts of U.S. cancer patients and survivors. Methods A primary cohort of 5,591,168 of cancer patients and a 5-yr survivor cohort of 2,318,068 were constructed using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) data from 2000–2016, linked with county-level estimates of long-term average concentrations of PM2.5. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate PM2.5-mortality hazard ratios controlling for age-sex-race combinations and individual and county-level co-variables. Results Of those that died, 26% died of non-cancer causes, mostly from cardiopulmonary disease. Minimal PM2.5-mortality associations were observed for all-cause mortality (HR = 1.01, 95% CI = 1.00–1.03) per 10 µg/m3 increase in PM2.5. Substantial adverse PM2.5-mortality associations were observed for cardiovascular (HR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.26–1.39), COPD (HR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.01–1.20), influenza/pneumonia (HR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.33–1.80), and for cardiopulmonary mortality combined (HR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.21–1.30). PM2.5-cardiopulmonary mortality HR was higher for cancer patients who received chemotherapy or radiation treatments. Conclusions Air pollution is adversely associated with cardiopulmonary mortality for cancer patients and survivors, especially those who received chemotherapy or radiation treatment. Given ubiquitous and involuntary air pollution exposures and large numbers of cancer patients and survivors, these results are of substantial clinical and public health importance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.