Purpose
Repair of a lacerated flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon underneath or just distal to the A4 pulley can be technically challenging, and success may be confounded by tendon triggering and scarring to the pulley. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of partial and complete A4 pulley release in the context of a lacerated and repaired FDP tendon just distal to the A4 pulley.
Methods
Tendon biomechanics were tested in six cadaveric hands secured to a rigid frame permitting measurement of tendon excursion, tendon force, and finger range of motion. After control testing, each finger underwent laceration and repair of the FDP tendon at the distal margin of the A4 pulley using a six-strand core suture technique and epitendinous repair. Testing was then repeated after the following interventions: 1) Intact A4 pulley 2) Release of the distal half of the A4 pulley, 3) Complete release of the A4 pulley, and 4) Continued proximal release of the sheath to the distal edge of A2 (release of C2, A3, and C1 pulleys). Release of the pulleys was performed by incision; no tissue was removed from the specimens.
Results
From full extension to full flexion, average profundus tendon excursion for all intact digits was 37.9 ± 1.5 mm, and tendon repair resulted in average tendon shortening of 1.6 ± 0.4 mm. Flexion lag increased from less than 1 mm to over 4 mm with venting of the A4 pulley, complete A4 release, and proximal sheath release, respectively. Compared to the intact state, repair of the tendon with an intact A4 pulley, release of half the A4 pulley, complete A4 release, and proximal sheath release resulted in percent increases in work of flexion (WOF) of 11.5 ± 3.1%, 0.83 ± 2.8%, 2.6 ± 2.4%, and 3.25 ± 2.2%, respectively (p<0.05).
Conclusions
After FDP laceration and repair in the region of the A4 pulley, WOF did not increase by more than 3% from control conditions after partial or complete A4 pulley release, and WOF was significantly less than performing a repair and leaving the A4 pulley intact.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.