Abstract. Emergency medicine (EM) presents many cognitive, social, and systems challenges to practitioners. Coordination and communication under stress between and among individuals and teams representing a number of disciplines are critical for optimal care of the patient. The specialty is characterized by uncertainty, complexity, rapidly shifting priorities, a dependence on teamwork, and elements common to other risky domains such as perioperative medicine and aviation. High-fidelity simulators have had a long tradition in aviation, and in the past few years have begun to have a significant impact in anesthesiology. A national, multicenter research program to document the costs of teamwork failures in EM and provide a remedy in the form of an Emergency Team Coordination Course has developed to the point that high-fidelity medical simulators will be added to the hands-on training portion of the course. This paper describes an evolving collaborative effort by members of the Center for Medical Simulation, the Harvard Emergency Medicine Division, and the MedTeams program to design, demonstrate, and refine a high-fidelity EM simulation course to improve EM clinician performance, increase patient safety, and decrease liability. The main objectives of the paper are: 1) to present detailed specifications of tools and techniques for high-fidelity medical simulation; 2) to share the results of a proof-of-concept EM simulation workshop introducing multiple mannequin/ three-patient scenarios; and 3) to focus on teamwork applications. The authors hope to engage the EM community in a wide-ranging discussion and handson exploration of these methods. Key words: patient safety; performance; teamwork; team training; emergency medicine; simulation. ACADEMIC EMER- GENCY MEDICINE 1999; 6:312 -323 T HE PRACTICE of emergency medicine (EM) presents many cognitive, social, and systems challenges to clinicians and administrators. Education of emergency physicians (EPs) must optimally include training to manage the self, team, and environment under difficult conditions. Naturalistic decision making (NDM) is a growing school of thought that has led to greater understanding of how skilled people solve complex problems in the actual contexts in which tasks must be carried out. Job performance in EM can be characterized as consisting of the eight task and setting factors that serve as a framework for the NDM movement (Table 1).

Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) contribute to innate immunity as well as numerous diseases processes such as deep vein thrombosis, myocardial ischemia, and autoimmune disease. To date, most knowledge on NETs formation has been gathered via the qualitative microscopic examination of individual neutrophils in vitro, or aggregate structures in vivo. Here we describe a novel flow cytometry (FLOW)-based assay to identify and quantify NETs using antibodies against key NETs constituents, specifically DNA, modified histones and granular enzymes. This method is applicable to both murine and human samples for the assessment of induced NETs in vitro, or detection of NETosis in vivo in blood samples. This FLOW-based method was validated by comparison with the well-established microscopy assay using two genetic mouse models previously demonstrated to show defective NETosis. It was then used on healthy human neutrophils for detection of ex vivo induced NETs and on blood samples from patients with sepsis for direct assessment of in vivo NET-forming neutrophils. This new methodology allows rapid and robust assessment of several thousand cells per sample and is independent of potential observer-bias, the two main limitations of the microscopic quantification. Using this new technology facilitates the direct detection of in vivo circulating NETs in blood samples and purification of NETting neutrophils by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) for further analysis.

Specific interventions such as activated protein C for patients with severe sepsis have been shown to provide good value for money. However, overall there is a paucity of CEA literature on the management of the critically ill, and further high-quality CEA is needed. In particular, research should focus on costly interventions such as 24-hr intensivist availability, early goal-directed therapy, and renal replacement therapy. Recent guidelines for the conduct of CEAs in critical care may increase the number and improve the quality of future CEAs.