Despite the high π-acidity of thioether donors, ruthenium(II) complexes with a bidentate 1,2-bis(phenylthio)ethane (dpte) ligand and two chelating diimine ligands (i.e., Ru(diimine) 2 (dpte) 2+ ) exhibit room-temperature fluid solution emission originating from a lowest MLCT excited state (diimine = 2,2′-bipyridine, 5,5′-dimethyl-2,2′-bipyridine 4,4′-di-tert-butyl-2,2′-bipyridine, 1,10-phenanthroline, 5-methyl-1,10-phenanthroline, 5-chloro-1,10-phenanthroline, 5-bromo-1,10-phenanthroline, 5-nitro-1,10-phenanthroline, 4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline, and 3,4,7,8-tetramethyl-1,10-phenanthroline). Crystal structures show that the complexes form 2 of the 12 possible conformational/configurational isomers, as well as nonstatistical distributions of geometric isomers; there also are short intramolecular π−π interactions between the diimine ligands and dpte phenyl groups. The photoinduced solvolysis product, [Ru(diimine) 2 (CH 3 CN) 2 ](PF 6 ) 2 , for one complex in acetonitrile also was characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Variations in the MLCT energies and Ru(III/II) redox couple, E°′(Ru 3+/2+ ), can be understood in terms of the influence of the donor properties of the ligands on the mainly metal-based HOMO and mainly diimine ligand-based LUMO. E°′(Ru 3+/2+ ) also is quantitatively described using a summative Hammett parameter (σ T ), as well as using Lever's electrochemical parameters (E L ). Recommended parametrizations for substituted 2,2′-bipyridyl and 1,10-phenanthrolinyl ligands were derived from analysis of correlations of E°′(Ru 3+/2+ ) for 99 homo-and heteroleptic ruthenium(II) tris-diimine complexes. This analysis reveals that variations in E°′(Ru 3+/2+ ) due to substituents at the 4-and 4′-positions of bipyridyl ligands and 4-and 7-positions of phenanthrolinyl ligands are significantly more strongly correlated with σ p + than either σ m or σ p . Substituents at the 5-and 6positions of phenanthrolinyl ligands are best described by σ m and have effects comparable to those of substituents at the 3-and 8positions. Correlations of E L with σ T for 1,10-phenanthrolinyl and 2,2′-bipyridyl ligands show similar results, except that σ p and σ p + are almost equally effective in describing the influence of substituents at the 4-and 4′-positions of bipyridyl ligands. MLCT energies and d 5 /d 6 -electron redox couples of the complexes with 5-substituted 1,10-phenanthroline exhibit correlations with values for other d 6 -electron metal complexes that can be rationalized in terms of the relative number of diimine ligands and substituents.