BackgroundIn severe cases of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with alveolar tissue injury occurs. However, the time course and specific contributions of alveolar epithelial and endothelial injury to the pathogenesis of COVID-19 ARDS remain unclear.MethodsWe evaluated the levels of a circulating alveolar epithelial injury marker (soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products: sRAGE) and an endothelial injury marker (angiopoietin-2: ANG-2), along with an alveolar permeability indicator (surfactant protein D: SP-D) in 107 serum samples from nine patients with ARDS and eight without ARDS, all with COVID-19. We compared the initial levels of these markers between ARDS and non-ARDS patients, and analysed the temporal changes of these markers in ARDS patients.FindingsAll the initial levels of sRAGE, ANG-2, and SP-D were significantly higher in the ARDS patients than in the non-ARDS patients. The peak sRAGE level in the ARDS patients was observed at the very early phase of disease progression. However, the peaks of ANG-2 and SPD were observed at a later phase. Moreover, the ANG-2 level was significantly correlated with the arterial oxygenation and the SPD level, but the sRAGE level was not.InterpretationEvaluation of circulating markers confirms that COVID-19 ARDS is characterised by severe alveolar tissue injury. Our data indicate that the endothelial injury, which continues for a longer period than the epithelial injury, seems to be the main contributor to alveolar barrier disruption. Targeting the endothelial injury may, thus, be a promising approach to overcome ARDS with COVID-19.FundingNone
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.