The characteristics of aortic valvular outflow jet affect aortopathy in the bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). This study aimed to elucidate the effects of BAV morphology on the aortic valvular outflow jets. Morphotype-specific valve-devising apparatuses were developed to create aortic valve models. A magnetic resonance imaging-compatible pulsatile flow circulation system was developed to quantify the outflow jet. The eccentricity and circulation values of the peak systolic jet were compared among tricuspid aortic valve (TAV), three asymmetric BAVs, and two symmetric BAVs. The results showed mean aortic flow and leakage did not differ among the five BAVs (six samples, each). Asymmetric BAVs demonstrated the eccentric outflow jets directed to the aortic wall facing the smaller leaflets. In the asymmetric BAV with the smaller leaflet facing the right-anterior, left-posterior, and left-anterior quadrants of the aorta, the outflow jets exclusively impinged on the outer curvature of the ascending aorta, proximal arch, and the supra-valvular aortic wall, respectively. Symmetric BAVs demonstrated mildly eccentric outflow jets that did not impinge on the aortic wall. The circulation values at peak systole increased in asymmetric BAVs. The bicuspid symmetry and the position of smaller leaflet were determinant factors of the characteristics of aortic valvular outflow jet.

OBJECTIVES Sinus plication has emerged as a promising tool that can lead to better stability in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) repair. However, the mechanisms underlying the efficacy of this technique are unclear. We evaluated the hydrodynamic effect of sinus plication using the experimental pulsatile flow simulator and our original BAV model in vitro. METHODS Based on the computed tomography data of a BAV patient who had undergone aortic valvuloplasty, a BAV model (group C, n = 6) was developed with bovine pericardium and vascular prosthesis (J-graft Shield Neo Valsalva 24 mm). We performed sinus plication (group SP, n = 6) in the BAV model and compared hydrodynamic data with the control model in the pulsatile flow simulator. Non-fused cusp angle, annulus diameter and effective height were measured by ultrasonography. RESULTS The average flow was significantly increased in group SP compared to group C (4.24 ± 0.14 l/min vs 4.14 ± 0.15 l/min, respectively, P = 0.034). The mean transvalvular pressure gradient and regurgitant fraction were significantly decreased in group SP compared to group C (11.6 ± 4.3 mmHg vs 16.6 ± 5.0 mmHg, respectively, P = 0.009 and 14.1 ± 2.0% vs 17.4 ± 2.1%, respectively, P = 0.001). Ultrasound measurement indicated that non-fused cusp angle was significantly increased in group SP compared to group C (163.8° ± 9.2° vs 153.0° ± 4.6°, respectively, P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS Sinus plication in the BAV model significantly increased the commissural angle. It was effective in not only controlling regurgitation but also improving valve opening. These finding should be confirmed by evaluating cusp stress and/or long-term durability in the future studies.

Introduction: Abnormal hemodynamics with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is influenced by the BAV morphology. However, due to the morphological variety, the relationship between BAV morphology and hemodynamics has not been well clarified. We experimentally investigated influences of BAV morphology on hemodynamics. Methods: An MRI compatible pulsatile flow circulation system incorporating an aortic valve model and morphologically relevant aortic arch model was developed. Two types of BAV models with cusp angles of 240-120 (asymmetric BAV) and 180-180 (symmetric BAV) were prepared using bovine aorta and pericardium. The vorticity and eccentricity of jet in the aortic arch model in systolic phase were assessed using 4D-flow MRI. Streamlines at peak systole were compared among 5 BAV morphologies defined based on the symmetry and the position of leaflets (Fig). Results: Eccentric supra-valvular jets directed to the aortic wall faced to the smaller leaflet were present in the 3 asymmetric BAVs. In the ABAV-1, a markedly eccentric jet impinging on the aortic outer curvature was present. In the ABAV-2, a left-posterior directed jet shifting to the outer curvature of proximal arch was present. The asymmetric BAVs induced larger flow vorticity in the ascending aorta than the symmetric BAVs (ABAV-1 vs -2 vs -3 vs SBAV-1 vs -2, 0.018 vs 0.019 vs 0.014 vs 0.010 vs 0.011 m 2 /s). The ABAV-2 had a larger vortex in the middle arch than the ABAV-1 (ABAV-2 vs -1, 0.010 vs 0.005 m 2 /s). Conclusion: Our study indicated that the angles and orientations of the BAV impacted on the locations of jets impinging on the aortic wall and magnitudes of vorticities in systole. In the asymmetric BAVs, the direction of jet was influenced by the position of smaller leaflet. Our data suggests that the ABAV-1 morphology may be a risk factor inducing asymmetric aneurysm bulged toward the aortic outer curvature, while the ABAV-2 morphology may be a risk factor of an aortic aneurysm involving the transvers arch.

Introduction: Aortic diameter is a determinant index in deciding surgical intervention for aortic aneurysm with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). However, the treatment of a mildly dilated ascending aorta remains controversial. We experimentally investigated influence of mild dilatation of the ascending aorta on BAV-related hemodynamics in 3 BAV morphologies. Methods: An MRI-compatible pulsatile flow circulation system incorporating an aortic valve model and aortic arch model was developed. Tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) and 3 asymmetric BAV models including RL-, RN-, and LN-BAV were constructed by suturing bovine pericardium as cusps to aorta. The aortic arch models with the ascending diameters of 30 mm (non-dilatation) and 40 mm (mildly dilatation) were compared. Streamlines and the circulations (m 2 /s) of peak systolic flow in non- and mildly dilated ascending aorta were assessed using 4D-flow MRI in each BAV morphology (Fig). Results: Streamlines showed eccentric aortic valvular outflow jets impinging on the outer curvature of the ascending aorta, proximal arch, and left-anterior supra-valvular aortic wall in RL-, RN-, and LN-BAV, respectively. Regardless of the non-dilated or mildly dilated aorta, the circulations of peak systolic flow were larger in the BAVs than the TAV model (non-dilated aorta, TAV 0.005; RL- 0.016; RN- 0.026; LN-BAV 0.011 m 2 /s, mildly dilated aorta, TAV 0.009; RL- 0.017; RN- 0.028; LN-BAV 0.025 m 2 /s). Right-handed rotation was observed in RL- and RN-BAV, whereas LN-BAV presented left-handed rotation. In LN-BAV, the circulation markedly increased in the mildly dilated ascending aorta. Conclusions: Asymmetric BAV morphology was associated with highly eccentric aortic valvular outflow jet that directly impinged on the aortic wall, and the large circulation of peak systolic flow. The dilatation of the ascending aorta, even mild dilatation, might induce further increase in the circulation of systolic flow, especially in LN-BAV morphology.