This paper presents the results of a parametric study on the response of unreinforced and retrofitted masonry specimens. The adopted strengthening technique is the steel-reinforced plaster, which is very commonly used but it is not supported by a proper theoretical and experimental characterization in the scientific literature. The aim was to investigate the main parameters that affect the structural performances of the walls. Several numerical models were implemented using the finite element method to analyze the influence of the bricks’ arrangements, the mechanical properties of the mortar joints, the number of connectors, and the mechanical properties and thickness of the plaster coating. A concrete damage plasticity model was adopted to describe the bricks, the mortar joints, and the plaster behaviors. For the unreinforced specimens, the outcomes confirmed that the mortar strength had a significant influence on the performance of the wall, together with the presence of potential weaknesses in the bricks, while the bond effect was negligible. For reinforced walls, the connectors do not have a significant influence on retrofitted wall capacity but may prevent instability if a proper number is considered. Furthermore, the strength of the plaster coating does not affect the collapse load significantly, while increasing the fracture energy, which can be produced, for instance, by using fiber-reinforced concrete, increases the capacity of retrofitted walls, with more limited damage. Finally, an increase in the plaster thickness may be beneficial in terms of collapse load, even though greater thickness may increase the seismic masses significantly.
In Europe, the qualification of injection anchors in masonry under static and quasi-static actions is based on an assessment of tests performed in undamaged masonry. Nevertheless, in seismic prone countries like Italy the influences deriving from earthquake actions cannot be disregarded. Masonry elements are very sensitive to cyclic/seismic action and research on the behavior of anchors in damaged masonry is rather limited. The paper presents the results of an experimental campaign aimed at evaluating the residual tensile strength of adhesive anchors installed into undamaged walls that were subsequently subjected to cyclic in-plane loading to simulate seismic actions before. Consequently, the anchors experienced different stresses depending on their location within the walls. Overall, 29 tests were performed with anchors placed both, in undamaged and damaged areas. The results showed that there is a correlation between residual tensile strength and masonry initial conditions, and therefore the installation of anchors in masonry elements should be carefully planned avoiding areas that could be heavily damaged during seismic events or considering redundant connections in critical areas. In particular, it seems that the width of the crack (created by cyclic actions) that passes nearby/into the anchor borehole is the main parameter that affects the ultimate resistance of the anchors.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.