No abstract

Purpose: To determine the level of awareness and knowledge about glaucoma surgery and post-surgery counseling amongst paramedical staff at a tertiary eye-care hospital. Methods: This observational cross-sectional study included a random sample of 94 hospital personnel: 37 general nurse midwives, 47 ophthalmic assistants, and 10 patient caretakers (PCTs). Participants were administered a questionnaire about glaucoma surgery and post-surgery counseling of patients. Results: The study included 41 (43.6%) females and 53 (56.4%) males. The mean age of the participants was 24.85 ± 4.54 years. All participants were aware of trabeculectomy surgery in glaucoma (100%). A total of 95.7% knew that surgery helps in controlling IOP, of whom 57 (60.6%) participants got information during their course of learning. Overall 53 (56.4%) believed that surgery is done when medication failure occurs, and 58 (61.7%) knew that surgery helps in preserving vision. A total of 63 (67.0%) participants knew to counsel patients to visit an ophthalmologist when called for and take the treatment as advised, whereas 74 (78.7%) correctly said to visit an ophthalmologist immediately if pain/diminution of vision/discharge occurs. Overall, PCTs were found to be having significantly better knowledge ( P = 0.01) compared to others and they also reported ophthalmologists as the chief source of information. Conclusion: This study revealed that paramedical staff had an excellent awareness of trabeculectomy surgery. However, the knowledge and counseling parts of the questionnaire revealed less than satisfactory responses. So, there is a need to continuously educate paramedical staff members so that they can help in propagating information about the role of glaucoma surgery and the importance of proper follow-up.

Purpose To report a case of unilateral Iridocorneal endothelial (ICE) syndrome- Progressive iris atrophy (PIA) with an overlapping chronic angle closure glaucoma (CACG) and to highlight the effect of bilateral Laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) in such a co-occurrence. Case description A patient presented to us with bilateral gradual painless progressive diminution of vision. Both eyes (BE) had a clear cornea, shallow peripheral anterior chamber depth, grade 2 nuclear sclerosis, raised intraocular pressure and glaucomatous optic neuropathy. In addition, the Left eye (LE) had an irregular anterior chamber, peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS) extending to cornea, patchy iris atrophy, subtle corectopia and a low endothelial cell count on specular microscopy. Indentation gonioscopy led to the diagnoses of CACG BE with ICE syndrome- PIA LE. LPI was performed bilaterally. On Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (ASOCT), there was evident widening of the angle away from PAS in the Right eye as well as in the LE with PIA post LPI. Conclusion This is a unique case of unilateral PIA with an associated CACG in BE. It is the first case demonstrating the effect of bilateral LPI in such a case scenario. Though not indicated in ICE syndrome, LPI did show short term evidence of significant widening of the angle away from areas of PAS even in the eye with PIA having a limited high PAS and a concurrent primary (chronic) angle closure disease.

No abstract

<p>The Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) guides clinicians in England and Wales in how to support patients to make a capacitous decision. Documentation of patients’ capacity is mandatory for certain decisions in psychiatric hospitals so as to evidence the use of the MCA guidance. Given the importance of decisions such as where to live and what medication to take, the quality of clinician interview and documentation is important to monitor.</p><p><br />Method: The quality and quantity of decision-making capacity (DMC) documentation was reviewed in a psychiatric hospital in England for older adults. The clinical records of 49 discharged patients were examined retrospectively. All DMC documentation found was compared with existing legal guidance on capacity assessment.</p><p><br />Results: 46/58 DMC documents were found to be insufficient. There was little evidence of what information had been given to patients to enable autonomous decision making, what actions had been undertaken to optimise capacity and what alternative decision options were presented.</p><p><br />Conclusions: Consideration should be given by hospital managers to support DMC assessment by staff. Further reflection is needed on the part of regulators regarding the optimum DMC documentation standard, particularly regarding physical health medication for psychiatric inpatients. Guidance and training for all staff involved in the assessment and documentation of DMC should be made available.</p>