What is known and objective: The use of medications for secondary prevention is the cornerstone in the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, adherence to these medications is still suboptimal worldwide. This retrospective observational study aimed to assess the adherence to post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) medications, along with predictors of non-adherence. Methods:We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study to assess the adherence to post-PCI medications by determining the rate of prescription refills for 12 months after discharge among STEMI patients, as well as predictors of non-adherence. Adherence was assessed by medication availability 80% of the time monitored by the prescription refills rate for 1 year post-discharge.Results and discussion: A total of 1334 patients who presented with STEMI and underwent primary PCI were included in our retrospective analysis. The majority of patients included were male (96%) with a mean age of 51 ± 10.2 years. The overall adherence rate for all medications was only 28.4%, with an individual adherence rate of 50.5% for aspirin, 49.9% for P 2 Y 12 inhibitors, 48.1% for statins, 39.6% for betablockers and 42.9% for angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB). Factors that increased the likelihood of non-adherence were prolonged hospital length of stay and getting the medications with charge (aOR = 1.94, 95% CI 1.1-3.3; p-value = 0.017, aOR = 1.87, 95% CI 1.1-3.3; p-value = 0.029, respectively), while having a regular follow-up after discharge and attending the first clinic
Introduction: The Transradial artery access for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) is the preferred access for coronary interventions in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction STEMI due to less complications post intervention and it has been shown to improve quality of life of patients post intervention. This decrease in complications may give the patient sense of ease and underestimation of disease severity, and hence worsen the patient’s compliance with medications. This retrospective observation study aimed to assess the impact of radial versus femoral access coronary interventions on adherence to post-PCI medications. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis for all patients who presented with STEMI and underwent primary PCI in a tertiary cardiac hospital in Qatar between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2018. Adherence was assessed by refilling the first prescription post discharge. Adherence rates were compared between the patients who underwent PCI with radial versus femoral access using the Chi square test. Results: A total of 1339 patients who presented with acute STEMI and underwent primary PCI were included in our retrospective analysis. The majority of patients included were male (96%) with mean age of 51 years. The majority of patients (1082; 81%) underwent radial access, while 257 (19%) underwent femoral access. The two groups were comparable in terms of age, nationality, the presence of full versus partial insurance, and using medications before admission. The patients adherence to medications post-PCI, including aspirin, P2Y12 inhibitor, statin, beta-blocker, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor/ angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) was comparable between the radial versus femoral access ( aspirin: 78% vs. 74%; p-value= 0.16, P2Y12 inhibitor: 81% vs. 79%; p-value=0.45, statin: 80% vs. 76%; p-value= 0.15, beta-blocker: 72% vs. 70; p-value= 0.51, ACE inhibitor/ARB: 79% vs. 74%; p-value= 0.09). Conclusion: In comparison to femoral access in primary coronary intervention in STEMI, the radial access resulted in similar adherence to post-PCI medications assessed by refilling of first prescription post discharge. Therefore, the radial access is a safe approach in terms medications adherence.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.