Background Lymphedema is an accumulation of protein-rich fluid in the interstitial spaces resulting from impairment in the lymphatic circulation that can impair quality of life and cause considerable morbidity. Lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) has an overall incidence rate of 20%. Conservative therapies are the first step in treatment of LEL; however, they do not provide a cure because they fail to address the underlying physiologic dysfunction of the lymphatic system. Among several surgical alternatives, lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) has gained popularity due to its improved outcomes and less invasive approach. This study aims to review the published literature on LVA for LEL treatment and to analyze the surgical outcomes. Methods PubMed database was used to perform a comprehensive literature review of all articles describing LVA for treatment of LEL from Novemeber 1985 to June 2019. Search terms included “lymphovenous” OR “lymphaticovenous” AND “bypass” OR “anastomosis” OR “shunt” AND “lower extremity lymphedema.” Results A total of 95 articles were identified in the initial query, out of which 58 individual articles were deemed eligible. The studies included in this review describe notable variations in surgical techniques, number of anastomoses, and supplementary interventions. All, except one study, reported positive outcomes based on limb circumference and volume changes or subjective clinical improvement. The largest reduction rate in limb circumference and volume was 63.8%. Conclusion LVA demonstrated a considerable reduction in limb volume and improvement in subjective findings of lymphedema in the majority of patients. The maintained effectiveness of this treatment modality in long-term follow-up suggests great efficacy of LVA in LEL treatment.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Background: Oral cancer is said to be the 6th most common cancer in men and 12th in women. Potentially malignant disorders/potentially premalignant oral epithelial lesion (PMDs/PPOELs) have shown an increased risk of progressing to cancer. In this regard, lack of awareness about identification of oral PMDs among healthcare providers in general and oral pathologists in particular is said to be responsible for the diagnostic delay. Oral cancer is said to be the most common cancer in men and 3rd most common in women in the Indian subcontinent. PMDs have shown an increased risk of progressing to cancer. The various rates of conversion include 14%–51% for erythroplakia, 60%–100% for proliferative verrucous leukoplakia and 7%–26% for oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF). In this regard, early detection at PPOEL level will lead to prevention of malignant transformation. Aims and Objectives: The purpose of this survey was: 1. To determine if awareness among professionals is essential/key to challenge the progression of PMDs of the oral cavity. 2. To examine and/ordiscern if oral pathologists felt enough was being done to address the issue of early detection and prevention and how the scenario could be improved further. Materials and Methods: A survey was designed to assess the interest, zeal, knowledge and skill of healthcare providers in general and oral pathologists in particular in careful examination of the oral cavity and early detection of PMDs. A questionnaire with 18 questions was designed to address these issues/points and distributed among post-graduate students and practicing oral pathologists on online platforms. Results: The results of the esurvey were collected, analyzed and the results discussed question wise. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire was assessed and confirmed with Aiken's index for validity and Cronbach's alpha for reliability. Inferential statistical analysis was performed using Chi square test with P = 0.05 being statistically significant. Conclusion: On evaluation of the survey, we found that 85% of the surveyees are on agreement that PPOELs should be registered in a standard format and should be included in the list of recognizable diseases. 89.2% and 87.8% of the respondents would like to be part of an active body for early detection and diagnosis and for Cancer screening in our country respectively. In conclusion, the oral pathology fraternity is eager to work for and tackle these PPOELs head on, provided the right opportunities and training are meted out to them.