Introduction : Idiopatic congenital talipes equinovarus deformities in infants are difcult to treat due to its complicated pathoanatomy of the growing foot. As clubfoot deformities are pliable in the early weeks of life, treatment preserved is always conservative. Both manipulation and casting methods of Kite and Ponseti are commonly used with good outcomes 1. Though most orthopaedicians prioritize using Ponseti method, advantages and disadvantages of both treatment should be taken into consideration when selecting the treatment. So, we have decide to carry out a comparative study between Kite's and Ponseti method in the treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. 33 patients (48 feets) having idiopathic CTEV were randomized and divided into Materials and methods : two groups. 18 infants (26 feet) were selected and treated by Ponseti method and 15 infants (22 feet) were treated by Kite's method. The results of both group were compared based on Pirani score, time and number of casts required for correction, relapse and percentage of feet corrected. Ponseti Results : method had higher satisfactory correction rate (91.67% versus 80.95%), required less number of casts ( 7.57 versus 11.76), less duration of cast ( 53 days versus 82.35 days) and lesser percentage of relapse ( 8.33 % versus 9.52%). The relapse were corrected by remanipulation in both the groups. In case of bilateral idiopathic CTEV mean Pirani score decreased faster in the Ponseti group compared to Kite's group. The difference was statistically signicant 3rd week onwards in left sided CTEV and 4th week onwards in right sided CTEV. In case of unilateral idiopathic CTEV, the mean Pirani score in Ponseti group decreased faster in Ponseti group compared to Kite's group and the difference was statistically signicant 3rd week onwards. Both Ponseti and Kite's method of casting are effe Conclusion : ctive in correcting idiopathic CTEV deformities. Though correction rate was almost similar in both methods, Ponseti method proved slightly better than Kite's in correcting deformities faster with relatively lesser number and duration of casts. The Kite's method had an advantage of not needing any minor surgical procedure for the correction of deformity.
Background: Radial neck fractures in children are a rare injury, and the timing of surgery as well as the surgical technique will determine how well they respond to treatment. When the tilt surpasses 60 degrees, radial neck fractures in children are signicant injuries with frequent after effects. In these situations, conservative treatment is frequently insufcient, and open reduction may result in iatrogenic consequences. Retrograde intramedullary nailing of the radius is one method of treating dislocated radial neck fractures in children (the Metaizeau technique). Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome of Metaizeau technique. Methodology: After taking proper consent and ethical clearance a prospective study was conducted in 16 cases of closed radial neck fractures in children aged 6-12 years without any neurovascular decit. Patients were treated by Metaizeau technique at Jorhat medical college and Hospital from 2021-2022 and were followed up at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 10weeks and 12 weeks. Result: In this study, it is found that this technique is safe and effective in treating radial neck fracture in children. The fracture should be reduced within 7 days of injury. Later on, fracture reduction will be difcult because of brosis and fracture healing. In our study, average age was 9 years. Males were affected more than females and the common mode of injury was fall on outstretched hand. All cases achieved radiological and clinical union by 6 weeks. All cases achieved comparable exion-extension of elbow, supination-pronation of the forearm (as compared to healthy side). Average MEPS was 82.19 which was quite remarkable. Only one patient developed entry site pressure necrosis by cut end of TENS nail. The other disadvantage of this technique was need of second surgery for tens removal. Metaizeau technique is a minimally Conclusion: invasive technique with easy learning curve, minimal tissue damage, and reduced chance of elbow stiffness and osteonecrosis of radial head. Our results are within the acceptable range of satisfactory outcomes, if not more towards the better end of the outcomes quoted in literature.
BACKGROUND There is no consensus about the best option of internal fixation for unstable intertrochanteric fractures of femur. This study aimed to evaluate the treatment effects of contra-lateral reverse distal femoral locking compression plates in unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures as a viable alternative to intramedullary devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 30 cases with unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures were treated with contra-lateral reverse distal femoral locking compression plates. The period from injury to operation was 3-10 days. RESULTS The intra-operative blood loss was 160.5 ± 80 ml and the operation time was 55 ± 20 mins. The fractures united within 12-24 weeks (average 16.4 weeks). According to the Modified Harris Hip Score, the results were excellent in 15, good in 12, fair in 2 and poor in 1 case. Excellent and good rate of clinical results were 90%. 2 cases developed trochanteric bursitis due to irritation by hardware. 1 case had plate collapse who was offered surgical option but sought no treatment for malunion. None of the cases had any implant failure, non-union and any surgical site infection. CONCLUSION Contra-lateral reverse distal femoral locking compression plate is an effective way for treating unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures. However, early weight bearing should be avoided and judicious use of bone grafting wherever it is needed is recommended to achieve early union.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.