PurposeAcceptance sampling plans are a decision-making process on the basis of a randomly selected sampling from a party, where it is not possible to completely scan the products for reasons such as time and cost being limited or the formation of damaged products during the inspection. For some products, the life span (time from beginning to failure) may be an important quality characteristic. In this case, the quality control adequacy of the products can be checked with an acceptance sampling plan based on the truncated life test with a censored scheme for the lifetime of the products. In this study, group acceptance sampling plans (GASPs) based on life tests are studied under the Type-I censored scheme for the compound Weibull-exponential (CWE) distribution.Design/methodology/approachGASPs based on life tests under the Type-I censored scheme for the CWE distribution are developed by using both the producer's risk and the consumer's risk.FindingsIn this study, optimum sample size, optimum number of groups and acceptance number are obtained under the Type-I censored scheme for the CWE distribution. Real data set illustration is given to show GASPs how to be used for the industry applications.Originality/valueDifferent from acceptance sampling plans with just considering the producer's risk, GASPs are constructed by using two-point approach included both the producer's risk and the consumer's risk for CWE distribution.
Citation is considered as the most popular quality assessment metric for scientific papers, and it is thus important to determine what factors promote the citation count of a paper in comparison to the others in the same field. The main aim of this study is to model the citation counts of the research published in SCI or SCI-Expanded journals of Statistics field with the growing number of scientific works in Turkey. It is well known that the right-skewed nature of the counts makes the classical regression modelling inappropriate, even if the log transformation of counts is applied [1]. Due to the fact that distribution of citation counts involves a great number of zeros, this study serves for an additional aim that is to model the counts with advanced discrete regression models for a more precise prediction [2]. Data collected for this study consist of the citation counts of all scientific papers produced by 261 Statisticians in between 2005-2017. Discrete models varying from Poisson to Zero-Inflated or Hurdle were constructed by possible influential factors, such as the publication age, the number of references, the journal category etc. Predictive performances of alternative discrete models were compared via AIC and Vuong test [3]. Results suggested that Zero Inflated Negative Binomial and Hurdle Negative Binomial mixture models are the best forms to predict the zero inflation of citation counts [4]. In addition, the influential factors of the final model were interpreted to make some suggestions to Statisticians to increase the citation counts of their work.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.