Background Superior biomechanical performance of tapered interference screws, compared with non-tapered screws, with reference to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction process, has been reported in the literature. However, the effect of tapered interference screw’s body slope on the initial stability of ACL is poorly understood. Thus, the main goal of this study was to investigate the effect of the interference screw’s body slope on the initial stability of the reconstructed ACL. Methods Based on the best screw-bone tunnel diameter ratios in non-tapered screws, two different tapered interference screws were designed and fabricated. The diameters of both screws were equal to bone tunnel diameter in one-third of their length from screw tip, then they were gradually increased by 1mm, in the lower slope (LSTIS), and 2 mm, in the higher slope (HSTIS) screws. To simulate the ACL reconstruction, sixteen soft tissue grafts were fixed, using HSTIS and LSTIS, in synthetic bone blocks. Through applying sub-failure cyclic incremental tensile load, graft-bone-screw construct’s stiffness and graft laxity in each cycle, also through applying subsequent step of loading graft to the failure, maximum load to failure, and graft’s mode of failure were determined. Accordingly, the performance of the fabricated interference screws was compared with each other. Results HSTIS provides a greater graft-bone-screw construct stiffness, and a lower graft laxity, compared to LSTIS. Moreover, transverse rupture of graft fibers for LSTIS, and necking of graft in the HSTIS group were the major types of grafts’ failure. Conclusions HSTIS better replicates the intact ACL’s behavior, compared to LSTIS, by causing less damage in graft’s fibers; reducing graft laxity; and increasing fixation stability. Nonetheless, finding the optimal slope remains as an unknown and can be the subject of future studies.
Background Superior biomechanical performance of tapered interference screws, in regard to reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), compared with non-tapered screws, has been reported in the literature. However, the effect of tapered interference screw’s body slope on the initial stability of ACL is not studied yet. Thus, the main goal of this study was to investigate the effects of interference screw's body slope on the initial stability of the reconstructed ACL. Methods Based on the best screw-bone tunnel diameter ratios in non-tapered screws, two different tapered interference screw were designed and fabricated. The diameters of both screws were considered to be equal to bone tunnel diameter in one third of their length from screw tip, then they were gradually increased by 1mm, in the lower slope (LSTIS), and 2 mm, in the higher slope (HSTIS) screws. To simulate the ACL reconstruction, sixteen soft tissue grafts were fixed, using HSTIS and LSTIS, in synthetic bone blocks. Through applying sub-failure cyclic incremental tensile load, graft-bone-screw construct's stiffness and graft laxity in each cycle, and through applying subsequent step of loading graft to the failure, maximum load to failure, and graft’s mode of failure were determined. Accordingly, performance of the fabricated interference screws were compared with each other. Results HSTIS, compared to LSTIS, provides a greater graft-bone-screw construct stiffness, and a lower graft laxity. Moreover, transverse rupture of graft fibers for LSTIS, and necking of graft in HSTIS group were the major types of grafts' failure. ConclusionHSTIS compared to LSTIS, by causing less damage in graft's fibers; reducing graft laxity; and increasing fixation stability, better replicates the intact ACL's behavior.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.