PurposeTo conduct a systematic review on outcomes of three different techniques of autologous limbal stem cell transplantation (LSCT): conjunctival-limbal autografting (CLAu), cultivated limbal epithelial transplantation (CLET) and simple limbal epithelial transplantation (SLET), in unilateral limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD).MethodsLiterature searches were conducted in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register. Standard systematic review methodology was followed using Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. Studies with a sample size of more than 10 eyes were included. The primary outcome measure of efficacy was restoration of a completely epithelised, stable and avascular corneal surface (anatomical success). The secondary outcome measure of efficacy was improvement in best-corrected visual acuity of two-lines or greater (functional success).ResultsThe review identified 22 non-comparative case series, which included 1023 eyes. Ocular burns were the major (88%) indication for surgery. Overall, at a median postoperative follow-up of 1.75 years, autologous LSCT for unilateral LSCD showed anatomical and functional success rates of 69% and 60%, respectively, without any serious adverse events in the donor eye. The follow-up duration and indications for surgery were comparable across all groups (p>0.05). The anatomical and functional success rates of SLET (78%; 68.6%) and CLAu (81%; 74.4%) were comparable, and significantly better than those of CLET (61.4%; 53%; p=0.0048).ConclusionAutologous LSCT is a safe and effective treatment for unilateral LSCD. In the absence of randomised controlled trials, existing evidence clearly suggests that clinical outcomes are better with SLET and CLAu as compared with CLET.
Background
Fungal keratitis is a commonly occurring cause of corneal blindness which does not always respond to standard antifungal treatment. Rose bengal photodynamic antimicrobial therapy represents an alternative treatment that has worked in vitro and that was successfully implemented in the clinic to treat an aggressive infectious keratitis case.
Purpose
To evaluate the efficacy of rose bengal photodynamic antimicrobial therapy (PDAT) for the management of a patient with multidrug-resistant Fusarium keratoplasticum keratitis unresponsive to standard clinical treatment.
Results
In vitro results demonstrated the efficacy of rose bengal PDAT against a multidrug-resistant Fusarium keratoplasticum species. There was complete fungal inhibition in our irradiation zone on the agar plates. In the clinical case, the patient was successfully treated with two sessions of rose bengal PDAT, and at the eight month follow-up, there was no recurrence of infection nor adverse effects to report.
Conclusions and Relevance
Rose bengal PDAT is a novel treatment that may be considered in cases of aggressive infectious keratitis. Further studies are needed to understand the mechanisms of PDAT in-vivo.
This case report retrospectively reviews the outcome of a 43-year-old man with retinitis pigmentosa who suffered rapid anterior capsular phimosis in each eye within 3 weeks following uncomplicated phacoemulsification with continuous curvilinear capsulorrhexis and single-piece acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Anterior YAG capsulotomy was successfully performed in both eyes. It has been previously documented in the literature that capsular phimosis is more common in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. However, in the cases that were reviewed, capsular contracture progressed much less rapidly than in this patient. It is proposed that zonular dehiscence or increased lens epithelial cell fibrosis accompanying retinitis pigmentosa may be responsible for phimosis following phacoemulsification; in this case, the single-piece IOL may have offered less resistance to capsular contraction. Using a three-piece IOL, capsular tension ring, or making radial relaxing incisions in the anterior lens capsule may be useful approaches to minimize the aforementioned complications in patients with retinitis pigmentosa and cataracts.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.