For more than 40 years, the faculties of Duke University School of Medicine (SOM) and Stanford University SOM have encouraged or required students to engage in scholarship as a way to broaden their education and attract them to careers in academic medicine. A dedicated period of research was first integrated into the Duke curriculum in 1959 to provide an opportunity for students to develop into physician leaders through a rigorous scholarly experience in biomedically related research. Originally designed to foster experience in laboratory-based basic research, the third-year program has evolved in response to the changing landscape of medicine and shifting needs and career interests of the medical student population. Stanford University SOM also has a long-standing commitment to biomedical research and currently requires each student to complete an in-depth, mentored "scholarly concentration." In contrast to Duke, where most of the scholarly research experiences take place in an immersive third year, the Stanford program encourages a longitudinal, multiyear exposure over all four (or five) years of medical school. Although the enduring effects of embedding a rigorous research program are not yet fully known, preliminary data suggest that these experiences instill an appreciation for research, impart research rigor and methodologies, and may motivate students to pursue careers in academic medicine. The authors discuss the histories, evolution, logistics, and ongoing challenges of the research programs at Duke University SOM and Stanford University SOM.
We conducted a controlled trial of recombinant human GH (rhGH) in 27 healthy elderly women (66.7 +/- 3.0 yr), of whom 8 took a stable dose of replacement estrogen throughout the study (plus estrogen group). Hormone or placebo was given as a single daily injection. A total of 19 women were assigned to receive rhGH at an initial daily dose of 0.043 mg/kg BW. After several weeks, 50% dose reductions were necessitated by side-effects. The last 7 subjects to be enrolled began treatment at this reduced level. A total of 13 women assigned to rhGH and 14 women assigned to placebo completed 6 months of drug treatment. In the rhGH group, 6 women took estrogen; thus, the effects of rhGH were assessed separately by estrogen status. Circulating insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels were similar at baseline (rhGH, 133 +/- 40.4 micrograms/L; placebo, 128 +/- 13). rhGH increased IGF-I and IGF-I-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) in all subjects [6 month IGF-I in plus estrogen women, 230 +/- 25.4 micrograms/L; in those not receiving estrogen (minus estrogen), 308 +/- 21.3]. No changes in IGF-I or IGFBP-3 occurred with placebo (IGF-I, 144 +/- 21.3 micrograms/L). Skinfold thickness measurements showed an 11% decrease in fat mass (P < 0.005) and a 9% decrease in percent fat after 6 months of rhGH treatment. No significant difference in nitrogen balance was seen in either group at 6 months, but rhGH increased creatinine clearance by 9.2% (P < 0.05). rhGH dramatically increased markers of bone turnover, with more pronounced effects in minus estrogen women. Hydroxyproline excretion increased by 20% and 80%, and pyridinoline excretion increased by 44% and 75% in plus and minus estrogen subgroups, respectively. Osteocalcin concentrations increased by more than 60% in minus estrogen women (P < 0.05), but did not change in the plus estrogen group. No changes were observed in circulating type I procollagen extension peptide in either group, and no change in any turnover marker was seen in the placebo group. rhGH did not alter blood pressure or circulating L-T4 levels, but a transient increase in serum T3 was observed in the minus estrogen group at 3 months. rhGH decreased low density lipoprotein cholesterol in the minus estrogen group, but otherwise no significant changes in circulating lipoproteins or fibrinogen were observed. Eight women assigned to rhGH and 14 placebo-treated women remained on blinded treatment through 12 months.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.