Hydraulic fracturing technology is widely used to facilitate and enhance the gas recovery process from conventional and tight gas resources. Tight gas or unconventional reservoirs, that include very low permeability sandstones, carbonates, or shales, cannot be economically produced without hydraulic fracturing. Recently, much progress has taken place in the overall hydraulic fracturing procedures and the field implementations of advanced stimulation technology have produced good results. The proper selection of well trajectory, gel concentration, polymer loading, proppant type/size and concentration, perforation methods, locations for packer and frac port placement in a multistage fracturing assembly, number of fracture stages to cover the net pay, etc., have all contributed to successful stimulation and improved gas recovery. Even though stimulating gas reservoirs has become a routine application and much experience has been gained in this area, not all treatments are straightforward without problems and challenges. Unless a stimulation treatment is carefully designed and implemented, the post-stimulation results in moderate to tight reservoirs may not be encouraging, and can easily fall below expectation.
The most essential step to close the gap between expected results and actual well performance is to understand reservoir characteristics and its potential to produce at a sustained rate after a successful fracturing treatment. Overestimation of reservoir flow capacity and achieved fracture geometry will also over-predict well performance. This paper addresses the importance and impact of detailed reservoir characterization and superior stimulation processes on final well performance. Several field examples from Saudi Arabia’s gas reservoirs are presented in the paper showing the value of effective well planning, reservoir characterization, application of hydraulic fracturing, and proper cleanup.
The paper also illustrates the impact of drilling trajectory and wellbore reservoir connectivity on the proper placement of desired hydraulic fracture treatments and sustained gas production.
Clay swelling, dispersion and migration due to water-sensitive clay minerals in the producing formation can substantially reduce rock and retained proppant permeability resulting in reduced well productivity. The effects of water-based fracturing fluids in water-sensitive formations have been extensively investigated which led to development of different types of clay stabilizers based on type of clays, bottomhole temperature, and clay protection time. The use of KCl or NaCl brine up to concentration of 6% is well known clay stabilizing method for swellable and migratory clays during the stimulation treatment.However, using high salt content brines have some limitations and constrains. The performance of crosslinkers (Borate or Zirconium) and breakers are often affected when using high salt concentration in the base fracturing fluids. The sandstone formations of Saudi Arabia have been reported to be "water-sensitive" and can be easily damaged by fresh water. A novel clay stabilization liquid additive has been successfully introduced as a substitute to inorganic salts in fracturing fluids for sandstone formation in Saudi Arabia. This new permanent clay control additive is cationic polymer with ultra-low molecular weight (PC-4) and compatible with borate and zirconium crosslinkers. It also reduces safety concerns and operational time by eliminating handling and mixing of huge amount of salts on location.This paper provides details on lab testing, and field implementation of the novel cost effective clay control additive in HTHP sandstone gas well during proppant fracture treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.