No abstract

The cholinesterase inhibitor neostigmine indirectly stimulates muscarinic M(1)/M(2)/M(3) receptors, thereby reducing colonic distension in acute colonic pseudo-obstruction. We investigated the dose-response profile for the colonic sensorimotor effects of neostigmine and bethanechol, a direct muscarinic M(2)/M(3) agonist in humans. A barostat-manometric assembly recorded phasic pressures, tone, and pressure-volume relationships (compliance) in the descending colon and rectum of 30 healthy subjects who received intravenous neostigmine (0.25, 0.75, or 1.5 mg; n = 15) or subcutaneous bethanechol (2.5, 5, or 10 mg; n = 15). Sensation to luminal distension was also assessed. Thereafter, the effects of neostigmine and bethanechol on colonic transit (geometric center) were compared with those of saline by scintigraphy in 21 subjects. Both drugs increased colonic phasic pressure activity, reduced rectal compliance, and enhanced urgency during rectal distension. Neostigmine also reduced colonic and rectal balloon volumes, reflecting increased tone by an average of 12% and 25% for the highest dose, respectively. Only neostigmine reduced colonic compliance, accelerated colonic transit [mean geometric center at 90 min 2.5 vs. 1.0 (placebo)], and increased pain perception during colonic distension. We conclude that neostigmine has more prominent colonic motor and sensory effects than bethanechol. Moreover, neostigmine induces coordinated colonic propulsion, perhaps by stimulating muscarinic M(1) receptors in the myenteric plexus.

Background & Aims We compared the effects of weight loss induced with the glucagon‐like peptide‐1 agonist liraglutide, with that of lifestyle modification, followed by weight maintenance after discontinuing intervention, in obese adults with non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Methods Thirty obese (mean age 40.7 ± 9.1 years, BMI 33.2 ± 3.6 kg/m2, 90% male) adults with NAFLD defined as liver fat fraction (LFF) > 5% on magnetic resonance imaging without other causes of hepatic steatosis were randomized to a supervised programme of energy restriction plus moderate‐intensity exercise to induce ≥ 5% weight loss (DE group, n = 15), or liraglutide 3 mg daily (LI group, n = 15) for 26 weeks, followed by 26 weeks with only advice to prevent weight regain. Results Diet and exercise and LI groups had significant (P < 0.01) and similar reductions in weight (−3.5 ± 3.3 vs −3.0 ± 2.2 kg), LFF (−8.1 ± 13.2 vs −7.0 ± 7.1%), serum alanine aminotransferase (−39 ± 35 vs −26 ± 33 U/L) and caspase‐cleaved cytokeratin‐18 (cCK‐18) (−206 ± 252 vs −130 ± 158 U/L) at 26 weeks. At 52 weeks, the LI group significantly (P < 0.05) regained weight (1.8 ± 2.1 kg), LFF (4.0 ± 5.3%) and cCK‐18 (72 ± 126 U/L), whereas these were unchanged in the DE group. Conclusions Liraglutide was effective for decreasing weight, hepatic steatosis and hepatocellular apoptosis in obese adults with NAFLD, but benefits were not sustained after discontinuation, in contrast with lifestyle modification. Continuing the exercise learned in the structured programme contributed to the maintenance of liver fat reduction.

We compared the effects of weight loss induced by the glucagon-like peptide 1-agonist liraglutide with a structured lifestyle intervention in obese adults with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Obese (body mass index ≥30 kg/m , mean weight 96.0 ± 16.3 kg) non-diabetic Asian adults, with NAFLD diagnosed by liver fat fraction (LFF) ≥ 5.5% on magnetic resonance imaging without other causes of hepatic steatosis, were randomized to a supervised program of dieting (restriction by 400 kilocalories/d) plus moderate-intensity aerobic exercise (~200 min/wk; DE group, n = 12), or liraglutide at the 3 mg daily dose approved for weight loss (LI group, n = 12), for 26 weeks. Both DE and LI groups had significant (P < .01) and similar reductions in weight (-3.5 ± 3.3 vs -3.5 ± 2.1 kg, respectively, P = .72), LFF (-8.9 ± 13.4 vs -7.2% ± 7.1%, P = .70), serum alanine aminotransferase (-42 ± 46 vs -34 ± 27 U/L, P = .52) and aspartate aminotransferase (-23 ± 24 vs -18 ± 15 U/L, P = .53). In this first randomized study comparing the 2 weight-loss modalities for improving NAFLD, liraglutide was as effective as structured lifestyle modification.

Factor analysis of symptoms from a sample of Asian patients with functional GI disorders partially supported the use of the Rome II classification.