Purpose
This study aims to investigate customer experience (CE) and its relationship with intermediate variables to analyze the impact of digital banking (DB) on banks’ financial performance (FP) before Covid-19 and during the lockdown in Vietnam.
Design/methodology/approach
These research data are from a survey of Vietnamese customers. The survey was deployed to a sample of 238 and 218 customers of 20 Vietnamese commercial banks via email in 2018Q4 and 2020Q2, respectively. FP is measured using banks’ quarterly financial statements before Covid-19 and during the lockdown.
Findings
CE with DB had a significant and positive impact on FP via customer satisfaction before Covid-19, while the other two intermediate variables (word-of-mouth [WoM] and trust) had no considerable impact. During the lockdown, only WoM had a positive impact on FP. These findings indicate that before Covid-19, when customers could easily interact with their bank through many touchpoints, customer satisfaction with DB services created higher FP for the bank. However, during the lockdown, DB became the customer’s main touchpoint and WoM mediated the CE–FP relationship.
Originality/value
During the national lockdown from the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic in January 2020, customers in Vietnam may have had different experiences with DB when no alternate modes of payment were available. The study uses Covid-19 as a moderator variable to offer different viewpoints and findings related to CE with DB and its impact on FP.
Article History
JEL Classification:
E44This study aims to test the suitability of Proxy Levered Beta (PLB) in the context of corporate valuation in Vietnam. In particular, there are two main issues clarified in this paper: (i) whether there is a significant relationship between financial leverage, operating leverage, and systematic risk; and (ii) whether PLB can be an alternative of Market-Based Beta (MBB). By estimating with the panel data collected from nonfinancial firms listed on Ho Chi Minh Stock Exchange (HoSE) during the period 2010-2015, the empirical findings show that: (i) the operating leverage and financial leverage have a significant impact on systematic risk; (ii) PLB with adjusted financial leverage will be the most effective measure of MBB; and (iii) the new standard of industry classification on HoSE will not suitable to represent the systematic risk when measuring PLB in Vietnam.Contribution/ Originality: This study contributes in the existing literature in two ways: (i) concurrently considering both financial and operating leverage when adjusted beta coefficient instead of just financial leverage as previous studies; and (ii) providing the empirical evidence so that appraisers may not only apply them in Vietnam but also explain the valuation result to consumer convincingly.
This study aims to develop systematic models for the selection of comparable firms for firm valuation. The conventional approach argues that indicators such as firm size, growth rate, and industry should be considered for the selection of peer firms. However, this is sometimes very difficult for appraisers because it is almost impossible to find firms that capture all these criteria, especially in developing countries. Guided by business valuation theory, three indicators-profitability, earnings growth rate, and systematic risk-are applied by this study to build systematic models that simultaneously consider the many criteria affecting firm value. Using firm-level data from nonfinancial enterprises with 18,418 firm-year observations collected from the six ASEAN nations' stock exchange markets from 2010 to 2020, this study contributes to business valuation literature by developing systematic models for the selection of comparable firms. The results of this study are also practically significant for valuers because our models can be applied to peer group selection as well. Additional analysis shows that our models are more appropriate or suitable than models from previous conventional approaches that use the same industry or same firm financial characteristics.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.