Understanding bridging behaviors of clients of female sex workers (FSWs) is important for projecting and intervening in the spread of sexually transmitted infections in Vietnam. The goals of the study were to determine HIV/STI prevalence amongst different bridging groups, identify factors associated with being potential and active bridgers, and assess the association of drug use and unsafe sex with HIV and/or STI prevalence. In April, 2007, 292 clients were anonymously interviewed at sex venues in a two-stage time-location cluster sampling survey, followed by HIV, syphilis, and HSV-2 testing. Based on condom use with both high-risk (FSWs) and low-risk (wives/girlfriends) sexual partners, clients were classified as unlikely, potential, or active bridgers. The majority of clients were potential or active bridgers (55.8%) who had a significantly higher prevalence of herpes simplex type 2 (HSV-2) (21% and 33%, respectively) than unlikely bridgers (8.7%). HIV seropositivity was 4.4-fold (95% CI 1.1-17.1) higher among those who were HSV-2-positive. Clients of FSWs may be playing a major bridging role in transmitting HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in Vietnam. An observed synergistic interaction between drug use and condom slippage/breakage emphasizes the importance of proper condom use, particularly among drug users.
BackgroundIn Vietnam, like many countries in Southeast Asia, the commonly used approach of center-based compulsory drug treatment (CCT) has been criticized on human rights ground. Meanwhile, community-based voluntary methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) has been implemented for nearly a decade with promising results. Reform-minded leaders have been seeking empirical evidence of the costs and effectiveness associated with these two main treatment modalities. Conducting evaluations of these treatments, especially where randomization is not ethical, presents challenges. The aim of this paper is to discuss political challenges and methodological issues when conducting cost-effectiveness studies within the context of a non-democratic Southeast Asian country.MethodsA retrospective analysis of the political and scientific challenges that were experienced in the study design, sample size determination, government approval and ethics approvals, participant recruitment, data collection, and determination of sources, and quantification of cost and effectiveness data was undertaken. As a consequence of the non-randomized design, analysis of patient characteristics for both treatment types was undertaken to identify the magnitude of baseline group differences. Concordance between self-reported heroin use and urine drug testing was undertaken to determine the reliability of self-report data in a politically challenging environment.ResultsWe demonstrate that conducting research around compulsory treatment in a non-democratic society is feasible, yet it is politically challenging and requires navigation between science and politics. We also demonstrate that engagement with the government decision makers in the research conception, implementation, and dissemination of the results increases the likelihood of research evidence being considered for change in a contentious drug policy area.ConclusionsLocal empirical evidence on the comparative cost-effectiveness of CCT and MMT in a Southeast Asian setting is critical to consideration of more holistic, humane, and effective drug-dependence treatment approaches, but the garnering of such evidence is very challenging.
Introduction and Aims
Quality of life (QOL) is a relevant and quantifiable outcome of drug dependence treatment. We assessed health‐related QOL for people released from three centre‐based compulsory treatment (CCT) centres in Vietnam, using the EQ‐5D. The study aimed to examine the prognostic value of health‐related QOL in relation to time to relapse to heroin use among the participants.
Design and Methods
Two hundred and eight CCT participants with heroin dependence were interviewed at release, and at 3, 6 and 12 months post‐release. Health‐related QOL was measured with the EQ‐5D. Kaplan–Meier survival models were fitted using Cox modelling to examine the rate, timing and prediction of the number of days to heroin relapse and to examine the predictability of the health‐related QOL measures for days to relapse. Relapse was defined as first time of heroin use.
Results
The study found a substantial relapse rate (85.6%) among participants within 12 months following release from CCT centres; the mean number of days to relapse was 57.7 (SD = 31.6). There was no statistically significant change over time in the mean values of health‐related QOL (P = 0.11). While the total index score (across the five pre‐specified EQ‐5D domains) did not have a significant effect in predicting cumulative relapse, lower scores on the Visual Analogue Scale of the EQ‐5D were significantly (P < 0.05) predictive of cumulative relapse, with adjusted hazard ratios for relapse of 0.987 (P = 0.013).
Discussion and Conclusions
EQ‐5D Visual Analogue Scale score is a useful predictor of cumulative heroin relapse among participants released from CCT centres.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.