Background Hyaluronic acid fillers have a satisfactory safety profile. However, adverse reactions do occur, and rarely intravascular injection may lead to blindness. Currently there is no internationally recognized consensus on the prevention or management of blindness from hyaluronic acid filler. Objectives The authors sought to give guidance on how to minimize the risk and optimize the management of this rare but catastrophic adverse reaction. Methods A multinational group of experts in cosmetic injectables from multiple disciplines convened to review current best practice and develop updated consensus recommendations for prevention and bedside intervention if visual loss occurs after cosmetic injection of hyaluronic acid filler. Results The consensus group provided specific recommendations focusing on the consenting process, prevention, and early management of visual impairment related to intravascular hyaluronic acid filler injection. Conclusions Although visual loss due to filler injections is rare, it is important that both patient and physician be aware of this risk. In this paper the authors describe methods and techniques available to reduce the risk and also document suggested initial management should a clinician find themselves in this situation. Level of Evidence: 5
Background Although general guidelines are available for established silicone gel breast implants, the unique characteristics of the latest Motiva implants warrant specific guidelines. Objectives This study aimed to generate consensus recommendations and summarize expert-based advice to better understand current surgical practices and to establish guidelines for surgeons transitioning from other implant devices to the Motiva implants. Methods A survey was compiled by 12 plastic surgeon experts in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery and 1 biotechnology scientist, and distributed to 36 plastic surgeons to establish a consensus on the use of these devices. Surgical techniques, complication rates, and implant selection were among the topics discussed. Results The experts agreed on 3 core principles regarding the use of Motiva Round and Ergonomix implants. Firstly, the dissected pocket needs to be close fitting and steps must be taken to prevent expansion of the pocket. Secondly, implant selection must be individualized. Finally, surgical planning and technique must be carefully considered. When questioned about problems they had ecountered, 84.6% of the experts agreed that they experienced fewer overall complications and 76.9% confirmed reduced capsular contracture rates with these devices. Overall, 84.6% of the experts favored selecting Motiva Ergonomix implants over Round implants to achieve a more natural look. In addition, 92.3% of the experts agreed that Motiva implants, due to their innovative technology, reduce the risk of anaplastic large-cell lymphoma. Conclusions This international consensus of leading practitioners will assist plastic surgeons with patient selection, preoperative planning, and surgical technique. These recommendations are designed to optimize surgical outcomes, resulting in lower overall complication rates, more natural-looking breasts, and highly satisfied patients.
Background: The nasojugal groove or tear trough (TT) area deformity produces visible, pigmented, difficult-to-treat hollows. Hyaluronic acid (HA) filler–based correction yields variable results and complications. We developed an alternative, minimally invasive treatment for this area. Methods: Patients with significant, visible TT area pigmentation, and/or those requiring corrections for TT filler removal, were given lignocaine-diluted calcium hydroxyapatite (CaHA) fillers. CaHA boluses were placed deep on the bone, under the origin of the orbicularis retaining ligament, and under the sub–orbicularis oculi fat. Diluted CaHA was used as a subcutaneous biostimulatory wash. Efficacy and complications were assessed using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale and a modified Tear Trough Rating Scale, at 4 and 18 months. Results: Twelve patients, between 25 and 52 years of age, were treated and showed immediate improvements in hyperpigmentation due to light reflection and some visibility of the filler through skin. Lower eyelid swelling and redness occurred a few days postinjection but resolved spontaneously. Over 4 to 6 months, hyperpigmentation and skin tone, thickness, and color improved noticeably. Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale and modified Tear Trough Rating Scale scores indicated that all patients experienced satisfactory improvements. Three prior HA patients required a second CaHA treatment at 4–6 months for a satisfactory correction, one of whom required a third CaHA “wash” at 10 months. Some mild redness was observed for up to 12 weeks in a few patients; however, no differences in the degree of redness were observed between those treated for dark circles or post-HA correction. One patient experienced a persistent, dull erythema for 8 months; another had overt erythema and swelling following a chest infection which resolved with antibiotics and hydrocortisone cream. No nodules developed in any patient. Conclusions: We developed an alternative TT deformity treatment that leverages CaHA unique rheology and neocollagenesis-stimulating ability, which lifted and supported the prolapsing orbicularis retaining ligament, improved skin quality, and rejuvenated the periocular area without direct injections into the TT.
The authors describe a new modification of the breast reduction procedure. By means of an inframammary incision, the breast is mobilized from the chest wall, and a "doughnut" annulus of breast tissue is removed from the undersurface of the gland. No skin is excised. The nipple-areola complex is left attached to a central core of breast tissue that receives its blood supply from the subdermal plexus of vessels. When the resulting defect is closed within the breast by strategically placed sutures, the base of the gland is narrowed, the breast is projected forward, and the circumareolar and vertical scars of other techniques are eliminated. The authors report their results in a series of 37 patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.