Problem Anesthesiologists are often expected to supervise residents, nurse anesthetists, and anesthesiologist assistants in their practice. Development of a supervisory skill set is important during anesthesiology training and has a potential impact on the quality of patient care. During anesthesiology residency training, residents develop different competencies through direct supervision by a staff anesthesiologist. However, there is significant variability among anesthesia residency programs in the United States in terms of the opportunity residents have to supervise other anesthesia providers. The supervisory competency is not routinely evaluated during residency training. Intervention This study aimed at evaluating an educational seminar to foster the competency of supervision in anesthesiology. The 90-minute seminar included a live lecture and a series of workshops. The lecture had a duration of 45 minutes followed by three workshops of 15 minutes each. The workshops consisted of different simulated case scenarios with the participation of actors and a manikin as a patient. A debriefing session took place after the scenarios. Every resident included in the study participated in the workshops. The workshops were aligned with the learning objectives of the educational strategy. Context The study included 12 junior anesthesiology residents supervised by 24 senior residents during simulated clinical encounters. Quality of supervision, using the nine-item Quality of Supervision Questionnaire validated by De Oliveira Filho, and self-perception were evaluated before and after the educational intervention consisting of a face-to-face seminar and individual workshops administered during each encounter. Impact There was a significant difference between the overall means among senior residents for the quality of supervision measured by a nine-item quality of supervision questionnaire before and after the educational intervention program (3.11 ± 0.29 vs 3.96 ± 0.17, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference between the overall means for the self-perception of the senior residents before and after the intervention program (3.51 ± 0.54 vs. 3.48 ± 0.20). Lessons learned A bimodal educational intervention combining face-to-face seminars and workshops is effective to improve the quality of supervision in senior residents; however, it does not change the self-perception of the supervisory process. Addition of this type of educational intervention to the anesthesiology residency curriculum would add to the development of the supervisory competency and warrants further research in clinical situations.

<p>Objetivo: Comparar el efecto de tres diferentes tipos de fijación sobre la migración del catéter epidural durante el trabajo de parto.</p><p>Introducción: El fallo del bloqueo epidural en el trabajo de parto se debe a múltiples factores incluyendo la migración de catéter. La migración de catéter epidural se ha relacionado con el índice de masa corporal y la posición, así como con movimientos del paciente. La técnica de fijación también afecta la migración de catéter y el riesgo de bloqueo epidural fallido.</p><p>Métodos: Las pacientes fueron aleatorizadas y asignadas a uno de tres grupos según el tipo de fijación: Tegaderm^TM (Grupo T), Tegaderm^TM con almohadilla adhesiva (Grupo P) y Tegaderm^TM con Steri-Strip^TM (Grupo S). Las variables evaluadas incluyeron paridad, edad gestacional, índice de masa corporal (IMC), nivel de punción y distancia de migración del catéter epidural.</p><p>Resultados: Se detectó una diferencia en la distancia de migración de catéter epidural entre los diferentes grupos (p&lt;0.05). La comparación reveló diferencia únicamente entre los grupos P y T (0.76±1.35 vs. -0.14±1.03, p&lt;0.01).</p><p>Conclusión: Tegaderm^TM como método de fijación de catéter epidural en el trabajo de parto resultó ser inferior al Tegaderm^TM con almohadilla adhesiva o con Steri-Strip^TM en términos de migración de catéter. No existe una asociación entre migración de catéter epidural e IMC.</p>

Background. Anesthesia providers may need to interpret the output of vital sign monitors based on auditory cues, in the context of multitasking in the operating room. This study aims to evaluate the ability of different anesthesia providers to estimate heart rate and oxygen saturation in a simulation setting. Methods. Sixty anesthesia providers (residents, nurse anesthetics, and anesthesiologists) were studied. Four scenarios were arranged in a simulation context. Two baseline scenarios with and without waveform visual aid, and two scenarios with variation of heart rate and/or oxygen saturation were used to assess the accuracy of the estimation made by the participants. Results. When the accurate threshold for the heart rate was set at less than 5 beats per minute, the providers only had a correct estimation at two baseline settings with visual aids (p=0.22 and 0.2237). Anesthesia providers tend to underestimate the heart rate when it increases. Providers failed to accurately estimate oxygen saturation with or without visual aid (p=0.0276 and 0.0105, respectively). Change in recording settings significantly affected the accuracy of heart rate estimation (p<0.0001), and different experience levels affected the estimation accuracy (p=0.041). Conclusion. The ability of anesthesia providers with different levels of experience to assess baseline and variations of heart rate and oxygen saturation is unsatisfactory, especially when oxygen desaturation and bradycardia coexist, and when the subject has less years of experience.

Objective: To evaluate color flow Doppler flow ultrasound compared to standard clinical techniques, to detect the intravascular position of peripheral intravenous catheters in adult surgical patients. Methods: A prospective study was conducted in adult (>18 years old) patients scheduled to undergo elective surgery. Peripheral intravenous catheter position was evaluated with standard clinical techniques (free flow of fluid from a hanging bag, easy saline injection, and aspiration of blood), and with color flow Doppler ultrasound proximal to the insertion site to identify intravascular catheter position. Comparative test performance was carried out. Results: In total, 174 patients were enrolled. The venous catheter was deemed to be intravascular in 92.53% ( n = 161) and 90.23% ( n = 157) based on clinical evaluation and color flow Doppler, respectively ( p = 0.206). Moderate to substantial agreement between the two approaches was found. Cohen’s kappa was 0.64 (95% CI 0.43–0.83). Specificity of clinical judgment to detect catheter extravascular position was only 58.82%, when the color flow Doppler technique was set as the gold standard. Free flow from a hanging bag method showed the best agreement with color flow Doppler to determine intravascular position of a catheter ( p = 0.3173, kappa = 0.68), with sensitivity of 98.09% and specificity of 64.71%. Conclusion: Color flow Doppler is a specific tool complementary to sensitive clinical indicators to detect peripheral venous catheter infiltration. The ability of color flow Doppler to accurately determine the position of a peripheral venous catheter depends on experience and familiarity with the tool by providers, who can master the technique with education and training.