This study investigates the role of the business press in the pricing of accounting information. Using a comprehensive dataset of more than 111,000 earnings-related business press articles published from 2000 to 2010, we find that press coverage of the annual earnings announcement mitigates cash flow mispricing, but has a negligible effect on accrual mispricing. We provide evidence that this impact is driven primarily by the press disseminating the information more broadly, rather than by the creation of new content that helps investors understand the implications of accounting information. Our results suggest that the business press plays an important role in facilitating the market's ability to efficiently impound accounting information into stock prices and provide new insights into the role of the business press as an information intermediary in capital markets.

No abstract

Cornell, Rochester, Yale, and the BYU Accounting Symposium. I also thank Max Frumes of Quant Media, Chris Roush of Talking Biz News, and a WSJ reporter (who wishes to remain anonymous) for helpful discussions about the business press industry. I appreciate the financial support of the MIT Sloan School of Management and the Deloitte Foundation, which made it possible to focus on this and other studies during my PhD program. I am forever indebted to my dissertation committee, John Core, S.P. Kothari (co-chair), Eric So (co-chair), and Rodrigo Verdi for their guidance and support. If I can become even half the academic they are now, then I will feel like an enormous professional success. I am particularly grateful to my chairs, S.P. and Eric, for the countless hours they have patiently spent doing research with me. I have learned immensely from their examples. The companionship and support of my family helped keep my spirits high, especially during discouraging times. Most of all, I thank my wife Jenessa for sacrificing her time, comfort, interests, and sometimes health to get us through this degree and thesis. I also thank our parents and grandparents for instilling a love of learning in us, and our children, Marinn, Matthew, Brenna, and Taylor for their infectious eagerness to learn. Last, but certainly not least, I thank God for creating this beautiful world and for helping me begin to understand it. 'Throughout the paper, I use the terms "journalist" and "reporter" interchangeably to refer to the author(s) of a WSJ article and the editor(s) who review and revise the article before publication.

I reexamine whether media articles with substantive editorial content inform the market's reaction to firms' earnings news. Using variation in earnings announcement coverage because of restructuring at The Wall Street Journal (WSJ), my analyses suggest that WSJ earnings articles improve price discovery and increase trading volume at S&P 500 earnings announcements. Additionally, textual analysis suggests media articles that differ more from the firm's earnings release increase trading volume, and that the differences speed up

CEOs of S&P 500 firms that report high non-GAAP earnings relative to GAAP earnings receive substantial unexplained pay. Crucially, this result remains even after controlling for the level of non-GAAP and GAAP earnings. These firms are relatively poor performers (i.e., low GAAP earnings and stock returns) and have less powerful CEOs, consistent with non-GAAP earnings being used as justification when high executive pay is more likely to cause outrage. Additionally, despite the lower GAAP and return performance, these firms are more likely to beat the earnings targets specified in their compensation plans, which likely increases investors’ perceptions of core operating earnings and reduces outrage. Indeed, these firms face less dissent from shareholders and proxy advisors, and no additional media scrutiny. Our evidence suggests that the fraction of CEO pay that seems attributable to opportunistic non-GAAP reporting, while limited, is economically meaningful.