Computed tomography (CT) derived ventilation algorithms estimate the apparent voxel volume changes within an inhale/exhale CT image pair. Transformation-based methods compute these estimates solely from the spatial transformation acquired by applying a deformable image registration (DIR) algorithm to the image pair. However, approaches based on finite difference approximations of the transformation’s Jacobian have been shown to be numerically unstable. As a result, transformation-based CT ventilation is poorly reproducible with respect to both DIR algorithm and CT acquisition method. Purpose: We introduce a novel Integrated Jacobian Formulation (IJF) method for estimating voxel volume changes under a DIR recovered spatial transformation. The method is based on computing volume estimates of DIR mapped subregions using the hit-or-miss sampling algorithm for integral approximation. The novel approach allows for regional volume change estimates that 1) respect the resolution of the digital grid and 2) are based on approximations with quantitatively characterized and controllable levels of uncertainty. As such, the IJF method is designed to be robust to variations in DIR solutions and thus overall more reproducible. Methods: Numerically, Jacobian estimates are recovered by solving a simple constrained linear least squares problem that guarantees the recovered global volume change is equal to the global volume change obtained from the inhale and exhale lung segmentation masks. Reproducibility of the IJF method with respect to DIR solution was assessed using the expert-determined landmark point pairs and inhale/exhale phases from 10 4DCTs available on www.dir-lab.com. Reproducibility with respect to CT acquisition was assessed on the 4DCT and 4D cone beam CT (4DCBCT) images acquired for five lung cancer patients prior to radiotherapy. Results: The ten Dir-Lab 4DCT cases were registered twice with the same DIR algorithm, but with different smoothing parameter. Finite difference Jacobian (FDJ) and IFJ images were computed for both solutions. The average spatial errors (300 landmarks per case) for the two DIR solution methods were 0.98 (1.10) and 1.02 (1.11). The average Pearson correlation between the FDJ images computed from the two DIR solutions was 0.83 (0.03), while for the IJF images it was 1.00 (0.00). For inter-modality assessment, the IJF and FDJ images were computed from the 4DCT and 4DCBCT of five patients. The average Pearson correlation of the spatially aligned FDJ images was 0.27 (0.11), while it was 0.77 (0.13) for the IFJ method. Conclusion: The mathematical theory underpinning the IJF method allows for the generation of ventilation images that are 1) computed with respect to DIR spatial accuracy on the digital voxel grid and 2) based on DIR measured subregional volume change estimates acquired with quantifiable and controllable levels of uncertainty. Analyses of the experiments are consistent with the mathematical theory and indicate that IJF ventilation imaging has a higher reproducibility with res...
Purpose. To develop and evaluate the performance of a deep learning model to generate synthetic pulmonary perfusion images from clinical 4DCT images for patients undergoing radiotherapy for lung cancer. Methods. A clinical data set of 58 pre- and post-radiotherapy 99mTc-labeled MAA-SPECT perfusion studies (32 patients) each with contemporaneous 4DCT studies was collected. Using the inhale and exhale phases of the 4DCT, a 3D-residual network was trained to create synthetic perfusion images utilizing the MAA-SPECT as ground truth. The training process was repeated for a 50-imaging study, five-fold validation with twenty model instances trained per fold. The highest performing model instance from each fold was selected for inference upon the eight-study test set. A manual lung segmentation was used to compute correlation metrics constrained to the voxels within the lungs. From the pre-treatment test cases (N = 5), 50th percentile contours of well-perfused lung were generated from both the clinical and synthetic perfusion images and the agreement was quantified. Results. Across the hold-out test set, our deep learning model predicted perfusion with a Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.70 (IQR: 0.61–0.76) and a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.66 (IQR: 0.49–0.73). The agreement of the functional avoidance contour pairs was Dice of 0.803 (IQR: 0.750–0.810) and average surface distance of 5.92 mm (IQR: 5.68–7.55). Conclusion. We demonstrate that from 4DCT alone, a deep learning model can generate synthetic perfusion images with potential application in functional avoidance treatment planning.
Introduction Direct measurements of pulmonary perfusionReverend Stephen Hales (circa 1733) was the first to have quantitatively measured blood pressure and, variation in blood pressure during tidal breathing (Lewis 1994). Connecting a glass tube to a horse's crural artery and measuring the blood column height, Hales observed a decrease in the column's height during inspiration and an increase with expiration. This observation led to the theory that negative intrathoracic pressure affects left ventricular function by increasing the pressure at which the heart must work against the afterload (Buda et al 1979). It is now established that during spontaneous tidal breathing, venous return to the right atrium increases with the decrease in intrathoracic pressure (Pinsky 1984) and thus, pulmonary arterial blood flow to the lungs increases (Seely 1948).Previous efforts to measure respiratory induced variations in pulmonary perfusion and blood volume were limited to model systems. Brecher et al (Brecher and Hubay 1955) measured pulmonary blood flow (PBF) directly, using flow meters connected to the pulmonary artery and apical vena cava in normal spontaneous breathing
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.