In the aorta, diabetes activates an osteogenic program that includes expression of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP2) and the osteoblast homeoprotein Msx2. To evaluate BMP2-Msx2 signaling in vascular calcification, we studied primary aortic myofibroblasts. These cells express vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) markers, respond to BMP2 by up-regulating Msx2, and undergo osteogenic differentiation with BMP2 treatment or transduction with a virus encoding Msx2. The osteoblast factor osterix (Osx) is up-regulated 10-fold by Msx2, but Runx2 mRNA is unchanged; the early osteoblast marker alkaline phosphatase increases 50-fold with mineralized nodule formation enhanced 30-fold. Adipocyte markers are concomitantly suppressed. To better understand Msx2 actions on osteogenesis versus adipogenesis, mechanistic studies were extended to C3H10T1/2 mesenchymal cells. Msx2 enhances osteogenic differentiation in synergy with BMP2. Osteogenic actions depend upon intrinsic Msx2 DNA binding; the gain-of-function variant Msx2(P148H) directs enhanced mineralization, whereas the binding-deficient variant Msx2(T147A) is inactive. Adipogenesis (lipid accumulation, Pparg expression) is inhibited by Msx2. By contrast, suppression of adipogenesis does not require Msx2 DNA binding; inhibition occurs in part via proteinprotein interactions with C/EBP␣ that control Pparg transcription. Thus, Msx2 regulates osteogenic versus adipogenic differentiation of aortic myofibroblasts. Myofibroblasts capable of both fates can be diverted to the osteogenic lineage by BMP2-Msx2 signaling and contribute to vascular calcification.Mineral deposition in the skeleton is regulated by morphogenetic, metabolic, mechanical, inflammatory, and endocrine factors. With aging, abnormalities in orthotopic (e.g. bone formation) and heterotopic arterial vascular calcification are observed with very high prevalence (1), the latter enhanced by hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, and chronic renal insufficiency (1, 2). At least three variants of vascular calcification have been described: (a) calcification of necrotic, intimal atherosclerotic plaques; (b) medial artery calcification; and (c) calcific sclerosis of the aortic valve. Vascular calcification is a highly significant complication of diabetes and has emerged as a powerful predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality (2). The molecular mechanisms that perturb normal vascular calcium metabolism are only beginning to be understood (1, 3, 4). Demer et al. (5) was the first to show that vascular calcification may progress via molecular processes similar to osteogenesis. This group showed that the powerful bone morphogen, bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2) 1 is expressed in calcified atherosclerotic plaques of humans (5). Bostrom et al. (6) further demonstrated that aortic calcification in response to matrix Gla protein deficiency was most likely via BMP2 signaling; matrix Gla protein can abrogate alkaline phosphatase (ALP) induction by inhibiting BMP2 association with the BMP receptor (6). Thus, these studies poi...
Over a century ago, the pathologist Rudolph Virchow recognized the involvement of calcified tissues in the pathobiology of vascular diseases (1). Coining the term "endarteritis deformans" he descriptively denoted the histological character of the atherosclerotic plaque as exhibiting features of a progressively calcified scar tissue that forms in response to a vascular inflammatory state. Since then, a minimum of three histoanatomic variants of macrovascular calcification, atherosclerosis, calcific valvular sclerosis, and medial artery calcification, have been shown arise in response to metabolic, mechanical, infectious, or inflammatory diseases (2-4). Both early and recent studies point to cellular processes that resemble bone formation at the histological level. However, Demer and co-workers (5) were the first to provide direct evidence for active osteogenic regulation of vascular calcification. They identified BMP2, 1 a powerful bone morphogenetic protein, as a key component of the mineralized atherosclerotic plaque (5). Thus, rather than being a passive process, vascular calcification is in part subject to active regulation. Once thought benign, the deleterious clinical consequences of calcific vasculopathy are now becoming clearer (6 -10). Patients with diabetes have increased mortality and 3-fold increased risk for lower extremity amputation in the setting of medial artery calcification (11). In patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis, a moderate to severe echocardiographic valve calcification score is the single best predictor of vascular disease progression, again exceeding blood pressure control, lipid control, and diabetes control in positive predictive value (12). Risk for stroke, particularly notable in post-menopausal women, is increased in the presence of aortic arch calcification (13). Multiple metabolic stimuli contribute to calcific vascular disease initiation and progression in patients with diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, poor glycemic control, and phosphate retention associated with renal failure contributing to vascular calcium accumulation (2). A fundamental understanding the molecular physiology of vascular calcification will provide insights useful for developing strategies to prevent and treat this macrovascular disease process.Metabolic contributions to vascular calcification are well known and include hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, hyperphosphatemia, vitamin D toxicosis, magnesium deficiency, and chronic renal insufficiency (2). The mechanisms whereby the metabolic insults of diabetes initiate and propagate vascular calcification are beginning to be examined in detail. Hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, and oxidative stress (3, 14) up-regulate the expression of vascular signaling molecules that promote mineral deposition in a process that resembles craniofacial bone formation (15). Hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia have
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.