Purpose The purpose of this study was to update the average environmental impacts of global primary zinc production using a life cycle assessment (LCA) approach. This study represents the latest contribution from zinc producers, which historically established the first life cycle inventory for primary zinc production in 1998 (Western Europe) and the first global LCA-based cradle-to-gate study for zinc concentrate and special high-grade zinc (SHG; 99.99 %) in 2009. Improvements from the previous studies were realized through expanded geographical scope and range of production technologies. Methods The product system under study (SHG zinc) was characterized by collecting primary data for the relevant production processes, including zinc ore mining and concentration, transportation of the zinc concentrate, and zinc concentrate smelting. This data was modeled in GaBi 6 and complemented with background data from the GaBi 2013 databases to create the cradle-to-gate LCA model. Allocation was used to distribute the inputs and outputs among the various co-products produced during the production process, with mass of metal content being the preferred allocation approach, when applicable. Results and discussion In total, this global study includes primary data from 24 mines and 18 smelters, which cover 4.7 × 10 6 MT of zinc concentrate and 3.4 × 10 6 MT of SHG zinc, representing 36 and 27 % of global production, respectively. While the LCA model generated a full life cycle inventory, selected impact categories and indicators are reported in this article (global warming potential, acidification potential, eutrophication potential, photochemical ozone creation potential, ozone creation potential, and primary energy demand). The results show that SHG zinc has a primary energy demand of 37,500 MJ/t and a climate change impact of 2600 kg CO 2 -eq./t. Across all impact categories and indicators reported here, around 65 % of the burden are associated with smelting, 30 % with mining and concentration, and 5 % with transportation of the concentrate. Sensitivity analyses were carried out for the allocation method (total mass versus mass of metal content) and transportation of zinc concentrate. Conclusions This study generated updated LCA information for the global production of SHG zinc, in line with the metal industry's current harmonization efforts. Through the provision of unit process information for zinc concentrate and SHG zinc production, greater transparency is achieved. Technological and temporal representativeness was deemed to be high. Geographical representativeness, however, was found to be moderate to low. Future studies should focus on increasing company participation from underrepresented regions.

Purpose A workshop was convened on life cycle assessment (LCA) applied to pavement. The workshop's primary goals were to establish common practices for conducting LCAs for pavements. In general, pavement LCA has been implemented without clear guidelines for modeling assumptions and reporting. This shortcoming has led to challenges in interpreting and comparing pavement LCA outcomes. Methods A 2-day workshop was convened with 45 participants from academia, US and foreign transportation agencies, and industry. The workshop yielded some agreement and dissent on proposed guidelines for implementing and reporting of pavement LCA. Discourse on particular topics was facilitated through break-out sessions tailored to the workshop attendees and their respective areas of expertise.Results and conclusions Consensus was not reached for all issues discussed at the workshop. Where consensus did not emerge, dissenting views were recorded and included in workshop reporting. However, the majority of topics did resolve with consensus and informed the development and revision of a publicly available framework and guideline for pavement LCA. This framework and guideline was available at the conference website (http://www.ucprc. ucdavis.edu/P-LCA/index.html) and remains available for continued comment.

No abstract