Effect-directed analysis (EDA) is
a commonly used approach for
effect-based identification of endocrine disruptive chemicals in complex
(environmental) mixtures. However, for routine toxicity assessment
of, for example, water samples, current EDA approaches are considered
time-consuming and laborious. We achieved faster EDA and identification
by downscaling of sensitive cell-based hormone reporter gene assays
and increasing fractionation resolution to allow testing of smaller
fractions with reduced complexity. The high-resolution EDA approach
is demonstrated by analysis of four environmental passive sampler
extracts. Downscaling of the assays to a 384-well format allowed analysis
of 64 fractions in triplicate (or 192 fractions without technical
replicates) without affecting sensitivity compared to the standard
96-well format. Through a parallel exposure method, agonistic and
antagonistic androgen and estrogen receptor activity could be measured
in a single experiment following a single fractionation. From 16 selected
candidate compounds, identified through nontargeted analysis, 13 could
be confirmed chemically and 10 were found to be biologically active,
of which the most potent nonsteroidal estrogens were identified as
oxybenzone and piperine. The increased fractionation resolution and
the higher throughput that downscaling provides allow for future application
in routine high-resolution screening of large numbers of samples in
order to accelerate identification of (emerging) endocrine disruptors.
Bioassays are particularly useful tools to link the chemical and ecological assessments in water quality monitoring. Different methods cover a broad range of toxicity mechanisms in diverse organisms, and account for risks posed by non-target compounds and mixtures. Many tests are already applied in chemical and waste assessments, and stakeholders from the science-police interface have recommended their integration in regulatory water quality monitoring. Still, there is a need to address bioassay suitability to evaluate water samples containing emerging pollutants, which are a current priority in water quality monitoring. The presented interlaboratory study (ILS) verified whether a battery of miniaturized bioassays, conducted in 11 different laboratories following their own protocols, would produce comparable results when applied to evaluate blinded samples consisting of a pristine water extract spiked with four emerging pollutants as single chemicals or mixtures, i.e. triclosan, acridine, 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2) and 3-nitrobenzanthrone (3-NBA). Assays evaluated effects on aquatic organisms from three different trophic levels (algae, daphnids, zebrafish embryos) and mechanism-specific effects using in vitro estrogenicity (ER-Luc, YES) and mutagenicity (Ames fluctuation) assays. The test battery presented complementary sensitivity and specificity to evaluate the different blinded water extract spikes. Aquatic organisms differed in terms of sensitivity to triclosan (algae > daphnids > fish) and acridine (fish > daphnids > algae) spikes, confirming the complementary role of the three taxa for water quality assessment. Estrogenicity and mutagenicity assays identified with high precision the respective mechanism-specific effects of spikes even when non-specific toxicity occurred in mixture. For estrogenicity, although differences were observed between assays and models, EE2 spike relative induction EC values were comparable to the literature, and E2/EE2 equivalency factors reliably reflected the sample content. In the Ames, strong revertant induction occurred following 3-NBA spike incubation with the TA98 strain, which was of lower magnitude after metabolic transformation and when compared to TA100. Differences in experimental protocols, model organisms, and data analysis can be sources of variation, indicating that respective harmonized standard procedures should be followed when implementing bioassays in water monitoring. Together with other ongoing activities for the validation of a basic bioassay battery, the present study is an important step towards the implementation of bioanalytical monitoring tools in water quality assessment and monitoring.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.