(4) disclose previously undetected features of GPCR behavior. Significant impact of DMR is therefore anticipated in the emerging areas of systems biology and systems pharmacology but also for the discovery of mechanistically novel drugs.3

No abstract

No abstract

FFA2 and FFA3 are closely related G protein-coupled receptors that bind and respond to short chain fatty acids. (FFA2 and FFA3 are the provisional International Union of Pharmacology designations for the receptors previously called GPR43 and GPR41, respectively.) Sequence comparisons between these two receptors and alignments with the related G protein-coupled receptor FFA1, linked to homology modeling based on the atomic level structure of bovine rhodopsin, indicated the potential for polar residues within the transmembrane helix bundle to play important roles in ligand recognition and function. In both FFA2 and FFA3, mutation of either an arginine at the top of transmembrane domain V or a second arginine at the top of transmembrane domain VII eliminated the function of a range of short chain fatty acids. Mutation of a histidine in transmembrane domain VI, predicted to be in proximity to both the arginine residues, also eliminated function in many but not all assay formats. By contrast, mutation of a histidine in transmembrane domain IV, predicted to be lower in the binding pocket, modulated function in some assays of FFA3 function but had limited effects on the function of acetate and propionate at FFA2. Interestingly, wild type FFA3 responded to caproate, whereas FFA2 did not. Mutation of the transmembrane domain IV histidine eliminated responses of FFA3 to caproate but resulted in a gain of function of FFA2 to this six-carbon fatty acid. These data demonstrate the importance of positively charged residues in the recognition and/or function of short chain fatty acids in both FFA2 and FFA3. The development of small molecule ligands that interact selectively with these receptors will allow further details of the binding pockets to be elucidated.Free fatty acid receptor 2 (FFA2), 4 formerly known as GPR43, and free fatty acid receptor 3 (FFA3), formerly known as GPR41, are a pair of closely related, previously orphan G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that respond to a range of short chain fatty acids (SCFA) (1-4). Their expression patterns in adipocytes, gastrointestinal cells, various leukocyte populations and, potentially, in pancreatic islet cells has suggested possible roles in the control of energy storage and in white cell migration and recruitment. Although variation in potencies are evident (2), particularly for acetate (C2), where FFA2 displays higher potency than FFA3, the high overlap between activating ligands for the two receptors has blurred pharmacological separation and clear resolution of their individual functions. However, this also implies that ligand recognition and binding by the two receptors is likely to share a number of similarities. Studies on other GPCRs whose ligands contain carboxylate groups indicate that positively charged amino acids within the transmembrane (TM) regions may be very important in ligand binding and/or function. For example, Tunaru et al. (5) demonstrated that an arginine residue in TM III of the high affinity nicotinic acid receptor, GPR109A (also called HM74A),...

The poorly characterized G-protein-coupled receptor GPR35 has been suggested as a potential exploratory target for the treatment of both metabolic disorders and hypertension. It has also been indicated to play an important role in immune modulation. A major impediment to validation of these concepts and further study of the role of this receptor has been a paucity of pharmacological tools that interact with GPR35. Using a receptor-β-arrestin-2 interaction assay with both human and rat orthologues of GPR35, we identified a number of compounds possessing agonist activity. These included the previously described ligand zaprinast. Although a number of active compounds, including cromolyn disodium and dicumarol, displayed similar potency at both orthologues of GPR35, a number of ligands, including pamoate and niflumic acid, had detectable activity only at human GPR35 whereas others, including zaprinast and luteolin, were markedly selective for the rat orthologue. Previous studies have demonstrated activation of Gα13 by GPR35. A Saccharomyces cerevisiae-based assay employing a chimaeric Gpa1-Gα13 G-protein confirmed that all of the compounds active at human GPR35 in the β-arrestin-2 interaction assay were also able to promote cell growth via Gα13. Each of these ligands also promoted binding of [35S]GTP[S] (guanosine 5'-[γ-[35S]thio]triphosphate) to an epitope-tagged form of Gα13 in a GPR35-dependent manner. The ligands identified in these studies will be useful in interrogating the biological actions of GPR35, but appreciation of the species selectivity of ligands at this receptor will be vital to correctly attribute function.