Summary Gain-of-function mutations in histone 3 (H3) variants are found in a substantial proportion of pediatric high-grade gliomas (pHGG), often in association with TP53 loss and PDGFRA amplification. Here, we describe a somatic mouse model wherein H3.3K27M and Trp53 loss alone are sufficient for neoplastic transformation if introduced in utero. H3.3K27M-driven lesions are clonal, H3K27me3-depleted, Olig2-positive, highly proliferative and diffusely spreading, thus recapitulating hallmark molecular and histopathological features of pHGG. Addition of wild-type PDGFRA decreases latency and increases tumor invasion, while ATRX knockdown associates with more circumscribed tumors. H3.3K27M-tumor cells serially engraft in recipient mice and preliminary drug screening reveals mutation-specific vulnerabilities. Overall, we provide a faithful H3.3K27M-pHGG model which enables insights into oncohistone pathogenesis and investigation of future therapies.

No abstract

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), the most common soft tissue sarcoma in children and young adults, is characterized by a partially differentiated myogenic phenotype. We have previously shown that the blocking of tumor growth and resumption of differentiation can be achieved by re-expression of miR-206, a muscle-enriched microRNA missing in RMS. In this work, we focused on BAF53a, one of the genes downregulated in miR-206-expressing RMS cells, which codes for a subunit of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex. Here we show that the BAF53a transcript is significantly higher in primary RMS tumors than in normal muscle, and is a direct target of miR-206. Sustained expression of BAF53a interferes with differentiation in myogenic cells, whereas its silencing in RMS cells increases expression of myogenic markers and inhibits proliferation and anchorage-independent growth. Accordingly, BAF53a silencing also impairs embryonal RMS and alveolar RMS tumor growth, inducing their morphological and biochemical differentiation. These results indicate that failure to downregulate the BAF53a subunit may contribute to the pathogenesis of RMS, and suggest that BAF53a may represent a novel therapeutic target for this tumor.

Background Diffuse midline gliomas (DMG) H3K27M-mutant, including diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG), are pediatric brain tumors associated with grim prognosis. Although GD2-CAR T-cells demonstrated significant anti-tumor activity against DMG H3K27M-mutant in vivo, a multimodal approach may be needed to more effectively treat patients. We investigated GD2 expression in DMG/DIPG and other pediatric high-grade gliomas (pHGG) and sought to identify chemical compounds that would enhance GD2-CAR T-cell anti-tumor efficacy. Methods Immunohistochemistry in tumor tissue samples and immunofluorescence in primary patient-derived cell lines were performed to study GD2 expression. We developed a high-throughput cell-based assay to screen 42 kinase inhibitors in combination with GD2-CAR T-cells. Cell viability, western blots, flow-cytometry, real time PCR experiments, DIPG 3D culture models and orthotopic xenograft model were applied to investigate the effect of selected compounds on DIPG cell death and CAR T-cell function. Results GD2 was heterogeneously, but widely, expressed in the tissue tested, while its expression was homogeneous and restricted to DMG/DIPG H3K27M-mutant cell lines. We identified dual IGF1R/IR antagonists, BMS-754807 and linsitinib, able to inhibit tumor cell viability at concentrations that do not affect CAR T-cells. Linsitinib, but not BMS-754807, decreases activation/exhaustion of GD2-CAR T-cells and increases their central memory profile. The enhanced anti-tumor activity of linsitinib/GD2-CAR T-cell combination was confirmed in DIPG models in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo. Conclusion Our study supports the development of IGF1R/IR inhibitors to be used in combination with GD2-CAR T-cells for treating patients affected by DMG/DIPG and, potentially, by pHGG.

Background: Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is a fatal disease with a median overall survival (OS) of less than 12 months after diagnosis. Radiotherapy (RT) still remains the mainstay treatment. Several other therapeutic strategies have been attempted in the last years without a significant effect on OS. Although radiological imaging is the gold standard for DIPG diagnosis, the urgent need to improve the survival has led to the reconsideration of biopsy with the aim to better understand the molecular profile of DIPG and support personalized treatment. Methods: In this study, we present a single-center experience in treating DIPG patients at disease progression combining targeted therapies with standard of care. Biopsy was proposed to all patients at diagnosis or disease progression. First-line treatment included RT and nimotuzumab/vinorelbine or temozolomide. Immunohistochemistry-targeted research included study of mTOR/p-mTOR pathway and BRAFv600E. Molecular analyses included polymerase chain reaction, followed by Sanger sequences and/or next-generation sequencing. Results: Based on the molecular profile, targeted therapy was administered in 9 out of 25 patients, while the remaining 16 patients were treated with standard of care. Personalized treatment included inhibition of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway (5/9), PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway and BRAFv600E (1/9), ACVR1 (2/9) and PDGFRA (1/9); no severe side effects were reported during treatment. Response to treatment was evaluated according to Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology criteria, and the overall response rate within the cohort was 66%. Patients treated with targeted therapies were compared with the control cohort of 16 patients. Clinical and pathological characteristics of the two cohorts were homogeneous. Median OS in the personalized treatment and control cohort was 20.26 and 14.18 months, respectively ( p = 0.032). In our experience, the treatment associated with the best OS was everolimus. Conclusion: Despite the small simple size of our study, our data suggest a prognostic advantage and a safe profile of targeted therapies in DIPG patients, and we strongly advocate to reconsider the role of biopsy for these patients.