ObjectiveA single-institution cohort of 92 consecutive pediatric patients harboring tumors involving the fourth ventricle, surgically treated via the telovelar or transvermian approach, was retrospectively reviewed in order to analyze the impact of surgical route on surgery-related outcomes and cumulative survival.MethodsClinical, radiological, surgical, and pathology details were retrospectively analyzed. We selected n = 6 surgery-related clinical and radiological outcomes: transient and permanent neurological deficits, duration of assisted ventilation, postoperative new onset medical events, postoperative cerebellar mutism, and extent of resection. We built univariate and multivariate logistic models to analyze the significance of relationships between the surgical routes and the outcomes. Cumulative survival (CS) was estimated by the cohort approach.ResultsThere were 53 girls and 39 boys (mean age, 83 months). Telovelar approach was performed in 51 cases and transvermian approach in 41 cases. Early postoperative MRI studies showed complete removal in 57 cases (62%) and measurable residual tumor in 35 cases (38%). The average tumor residual volume was 1,316 cm3 (range, 0.016–4.231 cm3; median value, 0.9875 cm3). Residual disease was more often detected on immediate postop MRI after telovelar approach, but the difference was not significant. Cerebellar mutism was observed in 10 cases (11%). No significant difference in the onset of cerebellar mutism was detected between telovelar and transvermian approach. The choice of surgical approach did not significantly modify any other postoperative outcome and 1-/3-year CS of high-grade surgically treated tumors.ConclusionsWith the limitation of a single-center, single-surgeon retrospective series, our findings offer significant data to reconsider the real impact of the choice of the surgical route to the fourth ventricle on the incidence of cerebellar mutism and surgery-related morbidity. This seems to be in line with some recent reports in the literature. Surgical approach to the fourth ventricle should be individualized according to the location of the tumor, degree of vermian infiltration, and lateral and upward extension. Telovelar and transvermian approaches should not be considered alternative but complementary. Pediatric neurosurgeons should fully master both approaches and choose the one that they consider the best for the patient based on a thorough and careful evaluation of pre-operative imaging.
Central nervous system tumors represent the most frequent solid malignancy in the pediatric population. Maximal safe surgical resection is a mainstay of treatment, with significant prognostic impact for the majority of histotypes. Intraoperative ultrasound (ioUS) is a widely available tool in neurosurgery to assist in intracerebral disease resection. Despite technical caveats, preliminary experiences suggest a satisfactory predictive ability, when compared to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. Most of the available evidence on ioUS applications in brain tumors derive from adult series, a scenario that might not be representative of the pediatric population. We present our preliminary experience comparing ioUS-assisted resection assessment to early post-operative MRI findings in 154 consecutive brain tumor resections at our pediatric neurosurgical unit. A high concordance was observed between ioUS and post-operative MRI. Overall ioUS demonstrated a positive predictive value of 98%, a negative predictive value of 92% in assessing the presence of tumor residue compared to postoperative MRI. Overall, sensibility and specificity were 86% and 99%, respectively. On a multivariate analysis, the only variable significantly associated to unexpected tumor residue on postoperative MRI was histology. Tumor location, patient positioning during surgery, age and initial tumor volume were not significantly associated with ioUS predictive ability. Our data suggest a very good predictive value of ioUS in brain tumor resective procedures in children. Low-grade glioma, high-grade glioma and craniopharyngioma might represent a setting deserving specific endeavours in order to improve intraoperative extent of resection assessment ability.
BACKGROUND Midbrain and surrounding areas are among the most difficult regions to surgically approach in neurosurgery. The subtemporal approach is a well-known neurosurgical approach that is rarely described in children. OBJECTIVE To assess the feasibility, advantages, and disadvantages of subtemporal approach in children. METHODS A total of 20 pediatric patients with intra-axial tumors involving the lateral midbrain or superior cerebellar peduncle or with extra-axial tumors in the middle incisural space/Meckel cave underwent subtemporal transtentorial approaches with the aim to remove (16 cases) or biopsy (4 cases) their lesions. These cases were retrospectively reviewed and the surgical approach described. RESULTS Total resection was achieved in 11 patients. In the 4 patients who underwent biopsies, a diagnosis was obtained. A total of 5 patients presented non-neoplastic lesions (dermoid tumors or cavernomas). A total of 9 patients harbored low-grade tumors and 6 high-grade tumors. Patients with low-grade tumors and non-neoplastic lesions are all alive with no evidence of disease or stable residue. Four patients affected by high grade tumors died. No patient suffered permanent neurological deficits related to the surgical approach. Three patients presented temporary neurological deficits following the procedure: one case of strabismus, one case of aphasia and hemiparesis, secondary to delayed, transient thrombosis of the Labbé vein, and 1 case of trigeminal neuralgia. CONCLUSION The subtemporal approach represents a feasible approach for mesencephalic and perimesencephalic lesions in children. It provides an ample and direct access, with excellent outcomes and acceptable postoperative morbidity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.