No abstract

Objective: Our aim was to assess the real-world effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors for treatment of patients with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). Methods: We conducted a multicenter survey compiling retrospective data from 79 PML patients, including 38 published cases and 41 unpublished cases, who received immune checkpoint inhibitors as add-on to standard of care. Oneyear follow-up data were analyzed to determine clinical outcomes and safety profile. Logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with 1-year survival. Results: Predisposing conditions included hematological malignancy (n = 38, 48.1%), primary immunodeficiency (n = 14, 17.7%), human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (n = 12, 15.2%), inflammatory disease (n = 8, 10.1%), neoplasm (n = 5, 6.3%), and transplantation (n = 2, 2.5%). Pembrolizumab was most commonly used (n = 53, 67.1%). One-year survival was 51.9% (41/79). PML-immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS)

Introduction Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is an infectious brain disease caused by JC virus in immunocompromised individuals. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) recently emerged as a therapeutic hope for these patients but identification of those likely to respond to the treatment is still an unmet need. Method We performed a systematic PubMed search for reports of patients treated for PML using an ICI. Clinical, biological and radiological characteristics were contrasted between patients who responded to the treatment (RP) and those who did not (NRP). Results Thirty‐five patients were included in the present study. Twenty‐one of them reportedly benefited from the treatment. Age, blood CD4+ cells count, pretreatment viral load in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), PML lesions localization, treatment delay since first PML symptoms, type of ICI used and immune‐related adverse events (irAEs) occurrence did not significantly differ between RP and NRP. By contrast, a history of therapeutic immune suppression and the use of an immunosuppressive therapy at treatment initiation were significantly associated with a poor response. Besides, reaching an undetectable viral load in the CSF and reduction of the lesion load on magnetic resonance imaging after ICI administration was associated with a good clinical response. Conclusion Current data suggest that patients with PML under immunosuppressive therapy are less likely to respond to ICIs and raises the issue of the optimal management of irAEs during ICI treatment in this setting.

A drug‐induced sarcoidosis‐like reaction is a systemic granulomatous reaction indistinguishable from sarcoidosis and occurring in temporal relationship with a drug initiation. In this article, we report a patient who developed lung and liver granulomatous lesions following tocilizumab initiation for a giant cell arteritis. Infectious, toxic, neoplastic and inflammatory differential diagnoses were ruled out and lesions regressed after treatment cessation, leading to the diagnosis of tocilizumab induced sarcoidosis‐like reaction. We review the 6 cases reported so far and emphasize the value of a prompt diagnosis. Finally, we discuss the potential pathophysiological mechanisms underlying this rare reaction, which could help to better understand the pathophysiology of sarcoidosis.