With an incidence of 58,000 cases per year, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common type of cancer in Germany. Although guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests (gFOBT) and colonoscopy are accepted strategies for CRC screening offered for individuals aged 50 or 55 onwards, utilization rates remain low.This study examines various determinants for participation in CRC screening using claims data provided by the AOK Niedersachsen and covering the years 2014 to 2016. Using multivariate logistic regression models, we analyzed sociodemographic factors (sex, age, nationality, type of employment) associated with screening behavior, including individuals who underwent colonoscopy or gFOBT. The effect of school education and professional qualification was estimated using subgroups of employees with social insurance.The analysis consisted of 620,977 insured individuals in the study population for screening colonoscopy, while the gFOBT study population contained 845,191 individuals. With increasing age, individuals were less likely to participate in CRC screening. Participation rates for screening were higher for women than men in younger age groups. However, men in higher age groups showed increased participation rates in gFOBT screening. When compared with German citizens, Turkish citizens use the colonoscopy less often and the gFOBT more often. In contrast to employees with social insurance, unemployed individuals accept the prevention services less frequently, whereas pensioners and voluntarily insured individuals exhibit increased participation rates. In terms of education and professional qualification, we estimated a significantly lower participation rate exclusively for the least educated individuals. The results help to better understand patterns of utilization and can contribute to the development of information programs for specific groups.

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Seit vielen Jahren erweitern Biologika die Therapieoptionen bei rheumatoider Arthritis (RA). Der Einsatz dieser biologischen „disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs“ (bDMARDs) ist gemäß deutscher und europäischer Behandlungsleitlinien jedoch erst bei Ausschöpfung der Methotrexat (MTX)-Erstlinientherapie von mindestens 20 mg/Woche indiziert. Ziel der Studie ist es, die Leitliniengerechtigkeit der MTX-Verordnung im ambulanten Sektor vor der Biologikatherapie zu überprüfen. Methodik Es wurden Routinedaten der AOK-Niedersachsen der Jahre 2013 bis 2016 für alle Versicherten zur Verfügung gestellt, die im Studienzeitraum eine RA-Diagnose sowie eine bDMARD-Verordnung aufweisen. Innerhalb eines patientenindividuellen Beobachtungszeitraums von 180 Tagen vor der ersten bDMARD-Verordnung wurde die maximal verordnete MTX-Dosierung untersucht. Ergebnisse Die Studienpopulation umfasst 405 Patienten (90 inzident, 315 prävalent). Bei 60,0 % der inzidenten Patienten und 67,0 % der prävalenten Patienten wurde eine maximale MTX-Verordnung von < 20 mg/Woche beobachtet. Männer weisen im Mittel mit 17,1 ± 4,8 mg eine höhere MTX-Maximaldosierung als Frauen auf (14,9 ± 5,0 mg; p < 0,0001); 29,6 % der Studienpopulation erhielten im Beobachtungszeitraum ausschließlich orale Verordnungen. Umstellungen auf eine parenterale Applikationsform wurden bei 12,4 % der Patienten festgestellt. Diskussion Ein gezielter Einsatz des gesamten vorgesehenen Therapiespektrums vor der Initiierung einer bDMARD-Therapie kann zu einer kosteneffizienten Versorgung der RA beitragen. Die Studie zeigt Indizien für mögliche Defizite in der ambulanten MTX-Verordnungspraxis auf und kann für eine effiziente Therapie sensibilisieren.

No abstract

Background: To investigate the management of children and adolescents with isolated and combined chest trauma in pediatric (PD) and non-pediatric departments (non-PD). Methods: Anonymized claims data were provided by two large German statutory health insurance funds, covering 6.3 million clients over a 10-year period (2010–2019). Data were extracted for patients who had an inpatient ICD diagnosis of section S20–S29 (injuries to the thorax) and were ≤18 years of age. Demographic and clinical data were analyzed. Results: A total of 4064 children and adolescents with chest trauma were included (mean age 12.0 ± 5.0 years; 55% male). In 1928 cases (47.4%), treatment was provided at PD. Patients admitted to PD underwent CT imaging less frequently (8.1%; non-PD: 23.1%; p < 0.0001). Children with a chest drain treated at university/maximum care hospitals (UM) showed more injuries involving multiple body regions compared with non-UM (25.8% vs. 4.5%; p = 0.0061) without a difference in the length of hospital stay. Conclusion: Children and adolescents with chest trauma are treated almost equally often in pediatric and adult departments. CT is significantly less frequently used in pediatric departments. Patients with a chest drain treated at a UM showed more concomitant injuries without a longer hospital stay. However, the clinical validity of this finding is questionable.