The COVID-19 pandemic has shifted oncology practices to prioritize patient safety while maintaining necessary treatment delivery. We obtained patient feedback on pandemic-based practices in our radiotherapy department to improve quality of patient care and amend policies as needed. We developed a piloted questionnaire which quantitatively and qualitatively assessed patients’ pandemic-related concerns and satisfaction with specific elements of their care. Adult patients who were treated at our Centre between 23 March and 31 May 2020, had initial consultation via telemedicine, and received at least five outpatient fractions of radiotherapy were invited to complete the survey by telephone or online. Relative frequencies of categorical and ordinal responses were then calculated. Fifty-three (48%) out of 110 eligible patients responded: 32 patients by phone and 21 patients online. Eighteen participants (34%) admitted to feeling anxious about hospital appointments, and only five (9%) reported treatment delays. Forty-eight patients (91%) reported satisfaction with their initial telemedicine appointment. The majority of patients indicated that healthcare workers took appropriate precautions, making them feel safe. Overall, all 53 patients (100%) reported being satisfied with their treatment experience during the pandemic. Patient feedback is needed to provide the highest quality of patient care as we adapt to the current reality.
Purpose/Objective(s) The COVID-19 pandemic has shifted practices in oncology to prioritize patient and healthcare staff safety while maintaining necessary treatment delivery. We obtained feedback from both patients and healthcare staff on pandemic-based practices in our radiotherapy department to adapt policies and procedures to improve safety and quality of care. Materials/Methods We developed a piloted questionnaire which quantitatively and qualitatively assessed patients’ pandemic-related concerns and satisfaction with specific elements of their care. Adult patients treated at the start of the pandemic with an initial consultation via telehealth and received at least 5 outpatient fractions of radiotherapy were invited to complete the survey by telephone or online. We simultaneously provided an online survey to our healthcare staff including radiation technologists, oncologists, dosimetrists, physicists and allied health professionals regarding workplace conditions and perceived safety. Relative frequencies of categorical and ordinal responses were calculated, and Mann-Whitney-U tests and t-tests were used to compare response rates between subgroups. Results A total of 53 patients (48% of eligible individuals) and 87 staff (44% technologists, 21% radiation oncologists, 36% other) responded to the surveys. Most patients responded positively to telehealth and pandemic department procedures, and all (100%) reported being satisfied with their treatment experience. Constructive criticism voiced in a minority of patients (13%) centered around hearing difficulties, appointment scheduling confusion, and a desire for access to more support services. In contrast, satisfaction with working conditions significantly decreased from 69% to 24% among staff, especially among technologists and oncologists. Multiple staff identified sub-optimal shift-scheduling, interprofessional communication gaps, and uneven assignment of tasks as the primary contributors to decreased morale. Of all the professionals surveyed, technologists were the most negatively affected, reporting increased workload, decreased efficiency, and dissatisfaction with work scheduling. Conclusion Patients have responded positively to new pandemic-related policies in our radiotherapy department and report overall satisfaction with their care. While patient satisfaction is high, the pandemic has resulted in decreased morale and the perception of increased workload among healthcare workers. Results from this study have been used to identify barriers to workplace satisfaction and have led to implementation of changes. This study highlights the importance of seeking feedback from both patients and healthcare workers to understand the complexities at play in preserving the quality of patient care and the work environment as we continue to work in the current reality.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.