Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy could offer an alternative to traditional chemo-and/or radiotherapy to treat pediatric cancer patients. To unveil the potential benefit of this new therapeutic approach, the prevalence of PD-L1 and other relevant immune markers using quantitative digital image analysis (DIA) could help to clarify this point. A bridging study was first conducted using commercially available normal formalin-fixed paraffinembedded (FFPE) tonsils to compare immunostaining patterns and intensities from PD-L1, tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) markers CD3, CD8, FoxP3, CD45RO, and macrophage marker CD68 in adult (n = 5) and pediatric (n = 10) samples. Then, commercially available pediatric FFPE tumor samples from five prevalent pediatric solid tumor indications: ganglioneuroblastoma (n = 7); neuroblastoma (n = 23); nephroblastoma (n = 30); osteosarcoma (n = 24); and rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 25) were immunostained and their images (n = 654) digitally analyzed using predefined algorithms. The qualitative analysis of staining patterns and intensities in all 15 tonsils for all 6 biomarkers was similar regardless of age category. Quantitative DIA showed that PD-L1 values varied across cancer-types, nephroblastoma having the lowest counts. PD-L1 counts in ganglioneuroblastoma, our pediatric indication with the highest average value, was approximately 12-times lower than in a similar nonsmall cell lung cancer study, an indication approved for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapies. Variable values were measured for the TIL markers CD3, CD8, and CD45RO. FoxP3 was scant across all indications. The macrophage marker CD68 showed highest values in ganglioneuroblastoma, with lowest levels in nephroblastoma. In conclusion, the low PD-L1 levels uncorrelated with TIL values from the present biomarker morphological study suggest that a PD-L1 immunohistochemistry patient selection strategy used for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy in adult tumors may not succeed in these pediatric indications. Figure 5. Clustered heatmaps of the individual cases (y-axis) based on standardized expression levels of the individual markers across investigated indications. Red or blue indicates higher or lower than average levels, respectively. 132MA Silva et al
Many targeted cancer therapies rely on biomarkers, which are assessed by standard pathologist scoring of immunohistochemically stained tissue. However, this process is subjective, semi-quantitative and does not assess expression heterogeneity. A quantitative method to measure IHC markers might therefore significantly improve patient selection particularly of proteins expressed at low levels. To address these challenges, we have developed the Quantitative Continuous Scoring (QCS) that deploys the power of fully supervised Deep Learning (DL) algorithms to provide objective and continuous data of biomarkers in digitized IHC whole slide images (WSI). The two DL-based algorithms, developed using pathologist input as the ground truth, identify areas of invasive tumor and segment each individual tumor cell across the WSI into pixels that represent cell nuclei, cytoplasm and/or membrane. This allows to compute biomarker expression as mean Optical Density (OD) in each of these subcellular compartments based on the Hue-Saturation-Density (HSD) model. Of note, this also allows computation of the spatial distribution of tumor cells across the WSI. The measured OD for each cell is aggregated as a histogram to quantitative continuous readouts for each patient sample. The method’s ability to accurately detect low expression range facilitates selection of antibody clones for IHC assays, has been successfully used to delineate mode of action and PK/PD mechanisms, has provided surrogate markers of spatial expression heterogeneity to predict potential bystander activity and has facilitated marker co-expression analysis to inform rational combination therapies. In retrospective clinical trials analysis, QCS showed superior performance in identifying a patient population gaining maximum treatment benefit. QCS-based quantification of PD-L1 membrane expression was able to stratify anti-PD-L1 treated late-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients [NCT01693562] with a higher prevalence and more significant log rank p-value (64%, p=0.0001) for OS compared to pathologist TPS (59%, p=0.01). In summary, we describe a computational pathology-based approach for precise biomarker quantification and superior patient selection with broad applicability and the potential to transform pathology, thus addressing one of the key challenges of precision oncology. Citation Format: Hadassah Sade, Ansh Kapil, Philipp Wortmann, Andreas Spitzmueller, Nicolas Triltsch, Lina Meinecke, Susanne Haneder, Anatoliy Shumilov, Jan Lesniak, Valeria Bertani, Tze-Heng Tan, Ana Hidalgo-Sastre, Simon Christ, Andrea Storti, Regina Alleze, Dasa Medrikova, Jessica Chan, Simon Lanzmich, Markus Schick, Guenter Schmidt, J. Carl Barrett. Quantitative assessment of IHC using computational pathology allows superior patient selection for biomarker-informed patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 468.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.