Background Digital health technologies enable patients to make a personal contribution to the improvement of their health by enabling them to manage their health. In order to exploit the potential of digital health technologies, Internet-based networking between patients and health care providers is required. However, this networking and access to digital health technologies are less prevalent in sociodemographically deprived cohorts. The paper explores how the use of digital health technologies, which connect patients with health care providers and health insurers has changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods The data from a German-based cross-sectional online study conducted between April 29 and May 8, 2020, were used for this purpose. A total of 1.570 participants were included in the study. Accordingly, the influence of sociodemographic determinants, subjective perceptions, and personal competencies will affect the use of online booking of medical appointments and medications, video consultations with providers, and the data transmission to health insurers via an app. Results The highest level of education (OR 1.806) and the presence of a chronic illness (OR 1.706) particularly increased the likelihood of using online booking. With regard to data transmission via an app to a health insurance company, the strongest increase in the probability of use was shown by belonging to the highest subjective social status (OR 1.757) and generation Y (OR 2.303). Furthermore, the results show that the higher the subjectively perceived restriction of the subjects' life situation was due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the higher the relative probability of using online booking (OR 1.103) as well as data transmission via an app to a health insurance company (OR 1.113). In addition, higher digital literacy contributes to the use of online booking (OR 1.033) and data transmission via an app to the health insurer (OR 1.034). Conclusions Socially determined differences can be identified for the likelihood of using digital technologies in health care, which persist even under restrictive conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, the results indicate a digital divide with regard to the technologies investigated in this study.

In the current COVID-19 pandemic, the importance of digital media as a source of information for health-related behavior is impressively demonstrated. Until now there has been a lack of national research on the influence of socioeconomic differences in digital literacy and in the use of COVID-19 information. This study aims to analyze the influence of educational status and subjective social status on digital literacy and on the ability in using COVID-19 information. Data from a cross-sectional online survey were used. The results indicate social differences in digital literacy and in the ability to critically evaluate COVID-19 information.

Access to digital technologies depends on the availability of technical infrastructure, but this access is unequally distributed among social groups and newly summarized under the term digital divide. The aim is to analyze the perception of a tracing app to contain Covid-19 in Germany. The results showed that participants with the highest level of formal education rate the app as beneficial and were the most likely to use the app.

Background The German government undertakes efforts to implement DiGA into the statutory health insurance to improve its quality. DiGA are physician-prescribed applications for patients with certain diagnosed diseases, whose costs are covered by the statutory health insurers. DiGA have the potential to improve healthcare, but it is also possible, that the usage of these applications perpetuates existing health inequalities, summarized by the term Digital Divide; meaning that socially deprived populations are less able to benefit from digital technologies. The aim of this analysis is to determine whether differences exist in DiGA use by sociodemographic/socioeconomic characteristics. Methods The results based upon the analysis of an online survey involving 1,200 people (18-74 years) living in Germany between March 10 and March 18, 2022. The sample composition reflects the current distribution of age, gender, and place of residence in the federal states (uncrossed). The questionnaire focused, among other aspects, on the use of DiGA. A binary logistic regression was used for the analysis. Results Compared to the lowest subjective social status (SSS), probands with a medium (OR 2.865) or a high SSS (OR 4.085) are more likely to use DiGA. Compared to the reference group (60 years and older), the 18-29-year- (OR 2.044) and the 30-39-year-olds (OR 1.952) tend to have a higher likelihood of using DiGA. The likelihood of the use decreases among probands with medium (OR 0.632) and high educational degree (OR 0.580) compared to the reference group (low education). Conclusions In accordance with the results of existing studies, social differences could be identified regarding known determinants of health inequalities, like age and SSS. In this analysis, the highest degree of education does not appear as a predictor for an increased likelihood of use. Thus, further analyses are needed to address the influence of education, especially to develop a broader understanding of the DiGA use. Key messages • It appears that DiGA are not equally accessible or used across different population groups, and thus indicating an already existing or emerging Digital Divide regarding the use of DiGA. • Contrary to the broad assumption that higher expressions of health determinants are related to a higher likelihood of using DiGA, a higher degree of education decreases the likelihood of using DiGA.

Aim Health literacy is necessary to access, understand, assess, and apply information on COVID-19. Studies have shown that health literacy is unequally distributed across social groups. This study aimed to analyze the differences in COVID-19-related health literacy (hereinafter referred to as “COV-19-HL”), knowledge about COVID-19, and the assessment of the measures taken regarding the sociodemographic characteristics as well as the influence of COV-19-HL on knowledge and assessments. Subject and methods The study used the data obtained from the cross-sectional online survey “Digital divide in relation to health literacy during the COVID-19 pandemic.” The data covers 1570 participants aged ≥18 years in Germany between April 29, 2020 and May 8, 2020. To analyze the differences by way of sociodemographic variables, t-tests and analyses of variance were carried out. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine the effect of COV-19-HL on knowledge and the assessment of measures. Results The overall COV-19-HL was high with an average value of 37.4 (with 50 representing the highest COV-19-HL). COV-19-HL and knowledge about COVID-19 were slightly lower in men, migrants, people with low subjective social status, and with low education. Government requirements and recommendations were rated as more effective by women, older people, and individuals with a chronic illness. The chance of better knowledge about COVID-19 and rating measures as effective increased with higher COV-19-HL. Conclusion The findings of this study show that COV-19-HL and knowledge about the virus are unequally distributed in Germany. Health communication should strengthen pandemic-related health literacy that is tailored to specific target groups.