One hundred eleven patients with acute rupture of the Achilles tendon were included in a prospective trial and randomly assigned to groups for operative (56 patients) or nonoperative (55 patients) treatment. All of the patients were followed with clinic evaluations at 4 months and 1 year after the rupture. The major complications in the operative treatment group were three reruptures and two deep infections as compared with seven reruptures, one second rerupture, and one extreme residual lengthening of the tendon in the nonoperative group. There were fewer minor complications in the nonoperative group than in the operative group. The operatively treated patients had a significantly higher rate of resuming sports activities at the same level, a lesser degree of calf atrophy, better ankle movement, and fewer complaints 1 year after the accident. The conclusion we reached through this randomized prospective study is that operative treatment of ruptured Achilles tendons is preferable, but nonoperative treatment is an acceptable alternative.
This study was performed to test the hypothesis that genetic variation in the promoter of the glucose transporter 2 (GLUT2) might predispose to prediabetic phenotypes or type 2 diabetes. A total of 1611 bp comprising the minimal promoter region of the GLUT2 gene were examined by combined single-strand conformational polymorphism and heteroduplex analysis followed by direct sequencing of identified variants on genomic DNA from 96 randomly recruited Danish type 2 diabetic patients. We identified 4 nucleotide variants, -447g-->a, -149c-->a, -122t-->c, and -44g-->a. None of the variants were positioned in known or presumed transcription factor binding sites, TATA-box, or transcriptional start site. Association studies of the -149c-->a, -122t-->c, and -44g-->a variants revealed that the variants were as prevalent in 320 type 2 diabetic patients [11.0% (95% confidence interval, 8.4-13.6), 9.8% (7.4-12.2), and 29.0% (24.4-33.6), respectively] as in 241 age-matched glucose-tolerant subjects [13.1% (9.8-16.4), 11.2% (8.3-14.1), and 33.4% (28.8-38.0), respectively]. The -447g-->a mutation was only identified in a single diabetic patient and did not show cosegregation with diabetes in the family of the proband. The three common variants showed in a primary genotype-phenotype study comprising 241 glucose-tolerant middle-aged subjects association to increased plasma glucose levels during an oral glucose tolerance test. However, this result could not be replicated in a second sample of 298 60-yr-old glucose-tolerant subjects. In conclusion, we found no evidence supporting the hypothesis that genetic variability in the minimal promoter of the GLUT2 is associated with type 2 diabetes or prediabetic phenotypes in the Danish population.
Disposition kinetics of disopyramide was examined in an open randomised cross-over study in 8 healthy volunteers. Disopyramide was randomly administered as a single bolus injection (150 mg) over a period of 5 min. and as an infusion (28.2) mg/h to steady state. Disposition kinetics of disopyramide were most precisely described by an open three compartment model according to Akaike's information criteria. Significant positive correlations (0.909 +/- 0.04, P less than 0.05 (injection study); 0.787 +/- 0.11, P less than 0.05 (infusion study] were observed between total serum concentrations of disopyramide and renal clearance while no significant correlation could be demonstrated between free serum concentrations and renal clearance. This implies a constant value of unbound renal clearance. The results are consistent with non linear kinetics (mainly caused by the variable free fraction of the drug), when based on total serum concentrations. The disposition of unbound disopyramide, however seems to be linear (i.e. the kinetic parameters are independent of dose) in the bolus injection study. Total elimination clearance (free and total), volume of distribution and elimination half-life were significantly higher in the steady state experiment than in the bolus injection study.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.