Computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD-CAM)-based techniques are developing fast in facial reconstruction and osteosynthesis. Patient-specific implant (PSI) production is already sufficiently fast for everyday use and can be utilized even for primary trauma surgery such as orbital floor reconstruction after blowout fracture. Purpose of our study is to retrospectively analyze the 3-dimensional (3D) success of PSI reconstructions of orbital floor fractures in our unit. The authors analyzed retrospectively a 1-year cohort (n = 8) of orbital floor blow-out fractures that have been reconstructed using virtual surgical plan and CAD-CAM PSI. Postoperative computed topographies of patients were compared to their original virtual surgical plans. The 3D outcome and fitting of the PSI was good in all patients. Mean error for 3D position of the PSI was 1.3 to 1.8 mm (range 0.4 to 4.8 mm) and postoperative orbital volume was successfully restored in all of the patients. Use of CAD-CAM PSI for reconstruction of orbital floor blow out fracture is reliable method and thus recommended.

Facial asymmetry is common in unilateral clefts. Since virtual surgical planning (VSP) is becoming more common and automated segmentation is utilized more often, the position and asymmetry of the orbits can affect the design outcome. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) patients requiring orthognathic surgery have asymmetry of the bony orbits. Retrospectively, we analyzed the preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) or computed tomography (CT) data of UCLP (n = 15) patients scheduled for a Le Fort 1 (n = 10) or bimaxillary osteotomy (n = 5) with VSP at the Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Center, Helsinki University Hospital. The width, height, and depth of the bony orbit and the distance between the sella turcica and infraorbital canal were measured. A volumetric analysis of the orbits was also performed. The measurements were tested for distribution, and the cleft side and the contralateral side were compared statistically with a two-sided paired t-test. To assess asymmetry in the non-cleft population, we performed the same measurements of skeletal class III patients undergoing orthognathic surgery at Päijät-Häme Central Hospital (n = 16). The volume of bony orbit was statistically significantly smaller (p = 0.014), the distance from the infraorbital canal to sella turcica was shorter (p = 0.019), and the anatomical location of the orbit was more medio-posterior on the cleft side than on the contralateral side. The non-cleft group showed no statistically significant asymmetry in any measurements. According to these preliminary results, UCLP patients undergoing orthognathic surgery show asymmetry of the bony orbit not seen in skeletal class III patients without a cleft. This should be considered in VSP for the correction of maxillary hypoplasia and facial asymmetry in patients with UCLP.