Objectives
We investigated the impact of underlying pulmonary limitations (PL) on symptoms and clinical outcomes after transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr).
Background
Patients with pulmonary disease and patients with symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR) suffer common symptoms like dyspnea and reduced exercise capacity.
Methods
Datasets from the TMVr Ulm registry were retrospectively analyzed by a blinded specialist in pneumology. Patients were dichotomized according to an unambiguous manifestation of concomitant pulmonary disease in a PL‐group and a non‐PL‐group and were analyzed regarding baseline characteristics and clinical follow‐up.
Results
Overall, 483 patients were included in the study of which 32.3% (n = 156) showed an underlying pulmonary disease. Patients in the PL‐group were similar to patients in the non‐PL‐group, including Euro SCORE II (8.2 vs. 8.4, p = 0.39), New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification (3.2 ± 0.7 in both groups, p = 0.65) and the incidence of moderate‐to‐severe or severe MR after TMVr (5.8 vs. 8.3%, p = 0.32). Equal and significant symptom relief after TMVr was experienced in both cohorts according to NYHA functional class (2.24 ± 0.84 vs. 2.24 ± 0.86, p = 0.93) and rate of hospitalization during 2 years of follow‐up decreased comparably from 61.1 to 19.3%. However, all‐cause mortality for 2 year follow‐up was significantly higher in the PL‐group compared to the non‐PL‐group (31.4 vs. 21.4%, p = 0.018).
Conclusion
In patients with MR and concomitant pulmonary disorders, a significant increase of exercise capacity and a significant decrease of rehospitalization rate were observed after TMVr. Nevertheless, all‐cause mortality remains significantly increased within a follow‐up period of 2 years compared to patients without pulmonary disorders.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.