SummaryBackgroundTo retrospectively analyze the outcomes of interventional radiology treatment of patients with hepatic artery stenosis (HAS) after liver transplantation at our Institution.Material/MethodsHepatic artery stenosis was diagnosed and treated by endovascular technique in 8 (2.8%) patients, who underwent liver transplantation between July 2007 and July 2011. Patients entered the follow-up period, during which we analyzed hepatic artery patency with Doppler ultrasound at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after percutaneous endovascular treatment (PTA), and every six months thereafter.ResultsDuring the 12-month follow-up period, 6 out of 8 patients (75%) were asymptomatic with patent hepatic artery, which was confirmed by multislice computed tomography (MSCT) angiography, or color Doppler (CD) ultrasound. One patient had a fatal outcome of unknown cause, and one patient underwent orthotopic liver retransplantation (re-OLT) procedure due to graft failure.ConclusionsOur results suggest that HAS angioplasty and stenting are minimally invasive and safe endovascular procedures that represent a good alternative to open surgery, with good 12-month follow-up patency results comparable to surgery.

SUMMARY The dose absorbed by sensitive breast glandular tissue in abdominal computed tomography examinations, even when the breasts are outside the primary imaging beam, is still significant. Several studies have explored using breast shielding with a protective lead sheet or a bra. Since the source of radiation in computed tomography rotates by 360° around the patient, we made a custom-tailored shielding device that wraps around the entire thorax. The hypothesis is that such a custom-tailored breast shielding device provides significantly better dose reduction. Study participants were female patients with no anatomic anomalies. Entrance surface doses were measured using thermoluminescence dosimeters placed on the skin of the breast in the control group without shielding and on the surface and below the shielding device in the group with anterior shielding and the group with the new device. As expected, according to literature data, doses measured at breast level were above the threshold that epidemiological studies determine as an increased risk of breast cancer development although they were not in the primary imaging plane. Preliminary results of our study showed that average dose reduction was 42% with conventional anterior shielding and 57% with wrapped shielding compared to the doses measured with no shielding.

No abstract

Cilj: Kompjutorizirana tomografska angiografija (CTA) zlatni je standard za otkrivanje endoleaka nakon endovaskularnog liječenja aorte (EVAR). Cilj je ovog rada utvrditi može li kontrastni ultrazvuk (CEUS) zamijeniti CTA u dijagnostici endoleaka nakon EVAR-a. Materijali i metode: Pregled literature na engleskom jeziku proveden je u bazama podataka: PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar. Ključne riječi bile su: “Computed tomography angiography”, “Contrast enhanced ultrasound”, “Endovascular aneurysm repair”, “Endoleak”. Studije koje su odgovarale kriterijima uključivanja recenzirane su u cijelosti te je odabrano 39 studija. Rezultati: Pacijenti su u analiziranim studijama najvećim dijelom bili muškarci (86 %). Medijan dobi iznosio je 74 godine. Endoleak nakon EVAR-a promatran je u infrarenalnih (79 %), jukstarenalnih (17 %) i suprarenalnih aneurizama (4 %). Stopa endoleaka kretala se između 3 i 52 %. Najčešći endoleak bio je po tipu II te se u 15 % slučajeva javljao unutar prvih šest mjeseci, odnosno u manje od 10 % slučajeva unutar dvije godine nakon EVAR-a. Za sve tipove endoleaka CEUS je pokazao uravnoteženu osjetljivost, specifičnost i područje ispod krivulje od 94 %, 88 % i 96 %. U odnosu na CTA, CEUS ima veću osjetljivost (94/83 %), ali lošiju specifičnost (94,8/99 %). Specifično za tip II endoleaka, CEUS je imao veću stopu detekcije (36,88/20,88 %). Visoka osjetljivost (97 %) i specifičnost (100 %) obilježje su CEUS-a u prikazu endoleaka tipa I i III, bez prednosti u odnosu na CTA. Zaključci: CEUS je slikovna metoda ravnopravna CTA u probiru pacijenata za endoleak nakon EVAR-a. CEUS ne može u potpunosti nadomjestiti CTA, no sigurna je i efikasna alternativa za korištenje u pacijenata bez CTA komplikacija nakon jednogodišnjeg kontrolnog intervala.

No abstract