In this work, we have investigated retention of maltooligosaccharides and their fluorescent derivatives in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography using four different stationary phases. The non-derivatized maltooligosaccharides (maltose to maltoheptaose) and their derivatives with 2-aminobenzoic acid, 2-aminobenzamide, 2-aminopyridine and 8-aminonaphthalene-1,3,6-trisulfonic acid were analyzed on silica gel, aminopropyl silica, amide (carbamoyl-bonded silica) and ZIC-HILIC zwitterionic sulfobetain bonded phase. The partitioning of the analytes between the bulk mobile phase and adsorbed water-rich layer, polar and ionic interactions of analytes with stationary phase have been evaluated and compared. The effects of the mobile phase additives (0.1% (v/v) of acetic acid and ammonium acetate in concentration range 5-30 mmol L(-1)) on retention were described. The suitability of different models for prediction of retention was tested including linear solvent strength model, quadratic model, mixed-mode model, and empirical Neue-Kuss model. The mixed-mode model was extended to the parameter describing the contribution of monomeric glucose unit to the retention of non-derivatized and derivatized maltooligosaccharides, which was used for evaluation of contribution of both, oligosaccharide backbone and end-group to retention.

linear and nonlinear retention-time models for reversed-phase liquid chromatography separations of small molecules, peptides, and intact proteins. J. Sep. Science, 39: 1249Science, 39: -1257Science, 39: . doi:10.1002 This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley-VCH Terms and Conditions for self-archiving". The applicability and predictive properties of the linear solvent strength model and two non-linear retention-time models, i.e., the quadratic model and the Neue model, were assessed for the separation of small molecules (phenol derivatives), peptides, and intact proteins. Retention-time measurements were conducted in isocratic mode and gradient mode ap-plying different gradient times and elution-strength combinations. The quadratic model provided the most accurate retention-factor predictions for small molecules (average abso-lute prediction error of 1.5%) and peptides separations (with a prediction error of 2.3%). An advantage of the Neue model is that it can provide accurate predictions based on only three gradient scouting runs, making tedious isocratic retention-time measurements obsolete. For peptides, the use of gradient scouting runs in combination with the Neue model resulted in better prediction errors (<2.2%) compared to the use of isocratic runs. The applicability of the quadratic model is limited due to a complex combination of error and exponential functions. For protein separations, only a small elution window could be applied, which is due to the strong effect of the content of organic modifier on retention. Hence, the linear retentiontime behavior of intact proteins is well described by the linear solvent strength model. Prediction errors using gradient scouting runs were significantly lower (2.2%) than when using isocratic scouting runs (3.2%).

No abstract