The article attempts to fill a lacuna in integration theory by developing a theory of national integration policy. It argues that integrating states face an integration dilemma, which they handle by various coping strategies. The article applies adaptation theory to explore these strategies and the general policy modes in which they are embedded. It argues that balancing, i.e. a 'give and take' approach, is the most likely policy mode, but that other defensive or offensive strategies may also be used. The argument is illustrated by an analysis of Denmark's integration policy.

The article explores the usefulness of James N. Rosenau's adaptation model for the analysis of foreign policy behavior. In the first part the structure of the model is analyzed, and several weaknesses and inconsistencies are pointed out. In the second part a reconstructed adaptation model is presented, and its component variables are discussed at some length. The revised model is based on the concepts of influence capability and stress sensitivity, the configuration of which is hypothesized to lead to four modes of adaptive behavior: dominance, balance, acquiescence and quiescence. Finally transformation from one adaptive mode to another is discussed.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract