Team offense in basketball games consists of a set of offensive actions carried out with the cooperation of two or more players. Of these actions, the most commonly used in the last decade is the on-ball screen called the “pick and roll.” The aim of this study was to analyze all of the pick and rolls conducted in the Euroleague championship from all of the 24 participating teams and to investigate the possible relationships between success in the pick and roll and overall success of the teams. For this purpose, 12,376 pick and rolls from 502 matches were analyzed and classified in categories according to the end result of the offensive possession. The results showed that the most effective type of pick and roll offense was when a shot was attempted after 2 passes from the pick and roll occurrence, followed by the screener’s shot when he rolled to the basket. Additionally, linear regression analysis confirmed that pick and roll effectiveness could predict the final classification of the teams. Conclusively, coaches of the high level European clubs should focus on training the players to the most efficient phases of the pick and roll offense, so that the chances of winning the championship to be maximized.
The lipid profile of elite basketball and soccer athletes was evaluated and compared with that of inactive individuals. Total cholesterol (T-C), low and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C and HDL-C), and triglyceride (TG) concentration were measured in the morning and after a soccer or a basketball match. All parameters of lipid profile measured at a fasted and resting state, except HDL-C, were lower in the athletes compared with the controls (p < 0.01). The soccer match resulted in a greater decrease in TG (78.3 ± 6.7 to 70.7 ± 6.3, p < 0.01), T-C (179.3 ± 10.7 to 171.6 ± 9.6, p < 0.01), LDL-C (110.9 ± 8.9 to 103.5 ± 7.5, p < 0.01) compared with the basketball match that resulted only in a decrease in LDL-C (126.8 ± 9.5 to 117.3 ± 9.1, p < 0.01) and an increase in HDL-C that was similar to that observed after the soccer match (9-12%). These findings support the beneficial effects of basketball and soccer on cardiovascular health.
BackgroundActinic keratosis (AK) is a chronic, precancerous skin disease. Various treatments options exist, including ingenol mebutate gel. The aim of this study was to compare its effectiveness and tolerability as well as the impact of therapy on patients’ quality of life in standard clinical practice.MethodsA multicenter study was carried out involving a 12‐month follow‐up period. A sample of 440 patients was included. Medical history details were recorded. Effectiveness, compliance to treatment, quality of life (EQ‐5D‐5L), and treatment satisfaction questionnaire for medication (TSQM‐9) at week 8 were assessed.ResultsOf the total 440 patients, 428 (97.3%) attended at 8 weeks assessment. The number of patients with complete clearance was 337 (78.7%). EQ VAS score was significantly increased (P < 0.001). As far as TSQM‐9 is concerned, patients with complete clearance reported statistically significantly higher satisfaction in effectiveness, convenience, and global satisfaction. At the 12‐month follow‐up visit, 323 patients (95.8%) retained their clearance status. Nineteen patients did not apply the ingenol mebutate gel on consecutive days. For these patients, the complete clearance rate was 42.1%, while for those who were treated on consecutive days, the complete clearance rate was 80.6%. None of our patients developed skin cancer.ConclusionsThis study supports that ingenol mebutate is effective for the treatment of AK with a good safety profile. It significantly improves quality of life. Limited adherence to treatment might be associated with reduced effectiveness.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.