(1) Age and hemopneumothorax did not affect mortality. (2) ISS was found to a strong predictor on outcome concerning morbidity and prolonged hospitalization but did not influence mortality rate. (3) Mechanical support was not considered a necessity for the treatment of flail chest.
A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) coronary bypass increases the risk for mediastinitis. Using the reported search 140 papers were identified. Twenty-four papers represented the best evidence on the subject and the author, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results and study comments and weaknesses were tabulated. In general, BITA grafting carries a 2.5- to 5-fold higher risk for mediastinitis after CABG. This risk is about 1.3-4.7% in non-diabetic patients compared to 0.2-1.2% for single internal thoracic artery (SITA) grafting. For diabetic patients with BITA grafting the risk of mediastinitis is significantly increased and can be as high as >10% in some series. However, for patients who undergo BITA harvest using skeletonization the risk is significantly lower and may be similar to patients receiving SITA graft only at around 0.4-2.6%. BITA grafting can be performed with acceptable risk in all patients including higher risk patients such as diabetics, in whom skeletonization of the internal thoracic arteries should be strongly considered rather than pedicled harvest.
In subgroups of patients differing in CHF severity according to the DASI, mean EQ-5D and SF-6D indices differed significantly. Contrarily, in socio-demographic and clinical groups, these utility differences were not directly evident. According to the evidence, comparisons based on severity classification via a valid disease-specific external instrument may provide insight on instrument choice in cost-utility analyses.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.