Introduction: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been the gold standard in the treatment of gallstones since last decades. Beside several benefits of laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with open surgery, postoperative pain is still a frequent melancholy.  Hence, pain management is utmost regarding patients' comfort. The main objective of the study was to compare the effect of intraperitoneal hydrocortisone plus bupivacaine with bupivacaine alone on pain relief following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.   Methods: A randomized study was conducted from December 2015 to August 2015 that included 100 patients aged 20 to 60 years of both genders who were found to have symptomatic gallstones and were scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy at Lumbini Medical College. Patients randomly received 100 mg hydrocortisone plus 100 mg bupivacaine in 200 ml normal saline (group A) or 100 mg bupivacaine in 200 ml normal saline (group B) into the peritoneum. Post-operative abdominal and shoulder pain were evaluated using Visual Analog Score (VAS). The patients were also followed up for postoperative analgesic requirements, and recovery variables. Data were collected, tabulated and analyzed statistically using SPSS version 19.   Results: Total number of patients in this study were 100. Age and gender among both groups were comparable. VAS scores for pain was significantly lower for group A as compared to group B at 0, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours. Time of oral intake in hrs for liquids and solids was statistically significant in Group A compared to Group B. Rescue analgesic requirement was also significantly low in Group A compared to Group B. Hospital stay in both group were comparable.   Conclusion: Combination of hydrocortisone plus bupivacaine can relieve pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy better compared to bupivacaine alone when administered intraperitoneally.

Background: Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia in orthopaedic surgeries helps to prevent thromboembolic phenomenon by increasing venodynamics. Adequate post-operative analgesia with good patient satisfaction has been observed with this technique. Objective:To assess the duration of postoperative analgesia and complications in patients receiving epidural anaesthesia with Morphine, Midazolam and Pethidine in combination with Bupivacaine. Methods:We prospectively studied 75 patients who were scheduled for elective lower limb orthopaedic surgery with epidural anaesthesia at Lumbini Medical College, Palpa from 2010 March to 2012 March. They were randomly divided by lottery method into three equal groups. Group 'A' (BP) received 50 mg epidural Pethidine (3 ml) with 13 ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine. Group 'B' (BM) received 5 mg (3 ml) epidural Morphine with 13 ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine and Group 'C' (BMM) received 5 mg (1 ml) epidural Morphine with 13 ml 0.5% Bupivacaine and 2 mg (2 ml) epidural Midazolam.All the patients were observed for 24 hours for quality of analgesia and other side effects like nausea, vomiting and pruritus. Data were analysed by Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS-16) software. Results:The result of the study shows the duration of analgesia was prolonged in BM group than BP group and even more so in BMM group (p value <0.001). Incidence of nausea and vomiting in BMM group was lower than in BP and BM group but statistically the difference was not significant (p value: 0.489). Pruritus was absent in BP group, less in BMM group while significantly higher in BM group. Conclusion:The use of epidural Morphine and Midazolam in combination with Bupivacaine is the satisfactory method of post operative analgesia. When Midazolam is added, duration of analgesia can be increased with decrease in incidence of nausea, vomiting and pruritus. METHODSWe prospectively studied 75 8. Weissman C. The metabolic response to stress:An overview and update. Anesthesiology. 1990;73:308-27. 9. Kehlet H. The stress response to surgery: Release mechanisms and the modifying effect of pain relief.

Introduction: Though the development of minimally invasive surgery  has revolutionized the field of surgery,  post-operative pain is still a significant issue. Unlike in the past, concerns about adverse effects have limited the role of opioids in post-operative pain management. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of intravenous paracetamol and  diclofenac as postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods:One hundred and twenty eight patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) categories I and II  included in this study  were divided into two groups. Anesthesia induction and maintenance were standardized. The first group received 15mg/kg (maximum 1gm) intravenous paracetamol and the second group received 2mg/kg (maximum 75mg) intravenous diclofenac 30 minutes prior to ending of surgery. A questionnaire was responded by patients and chart was maintained by visual analogue scale. Mann Whitney U test was used to analyze quantitative data and Chi-square test for categorical data. P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results:  Profiles of hemodynamic changes were almost similar in both groups with respect to heart rate and blood pressure. However, paracetamol infusion provided hemodynamic stability in post-operative period. We observed statistically significant differences  in visual analogue scale between the two groups. Most of the patients in paracetamol group had low mean pain scores in post-operative period and provided an extended analgesia compared to diclofenac. No serious postoperative complication was observed in  paracetamol group.   Conclusion: Administration of intravenous paracetamol has better and prolonged analgesic effect  with low mean pain score and less requirement for rescue analgesia compared to diclofenac.

Introduction: Intravenous Regional Anesthesia (IVRA) has been first described in 1908 by the German surgeon August KG Bier. Although the technique was convenient to perform and effective in giving surgical anesthesia, the recent plexus block techniques have largely replaced the "Bier’s block" instantly because of time limitations and safety considerations of IVRA. Throughout the years, modifications in procedure and new pharmacologic adjuvants have shown to prevent toxic reactions to anesthetics and mitigate limitations of IVRA, still IVRA can be preferred as choice of anesthesia for short procedures. Case Report: We present a case of 86 yr old male who was operated for radius fracture after a fall injury under Bier's Block or IVRA technique. Conclusion: IVRA can be the choice ofanesthesia for short procedures because of rapid onset of anesthesia, easy administration and cheaper cost with special considerations on its side effects, complications which can be the outcome of technical errors.

Introduction: Pain during the injection of anesthetic agents may be distressing and can reduce the acceptability of an otherwise useful agent such as propofol during daycare surgeries. Lidocaine and ketamine both are used as pre-treatment to decrease propofol induced pain. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of ketamine injection to decrease propofol-induced pain in comparison to lidocaine injection. Methodology: This is a prospective cross-sectional comparative study. Eighty-nine cases were divided into two groups where group K received ketamine 2 ml (0.2 mg/kg) whereas group L received lidocaine 2% 2ml (0.5 mg/kg) after venous occlusion with rubber tourniquet. One-fourth dose of propofol was injected 1 min after release of tourniquet and pain accessed at 0, 1, and 2 minutes of propofol injection with a verbal response and behavioral signs. Chi-square test and paired T-test were used and a p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Result: Regarding hemodynamic, oxygenation, and adverse effects there was no significant difference. Immediately after propofol injection, only 1 patient of the ketamine group had mild pain (2.22%) while 12 patients from the lignocaine group had mild pain (27.27%) with a p-value of 0.009. Also after 2 minutes of propofol injection, only 12 cases had mild pain i.e. 13.48% (1 from ketamine group i.e. 2.22% and 11 from lidocaine group i.e. 25%) with p-value of 0.002. Conclusion: Our study helps prove low-dose ketamine is more effective in reducing the incidence and severity of pain on injection of propofol in comparison to Lidocaine with better hemodynamic stability.